Towards a historical anthropology of Upland Laos

Abstract

When travelling across Houaphan province in upland north-eastern Laos in 2010, I took with me a copy of James Scott’s (2009) Art of Not Being Governed. This thought-provoking book offered fresh perspectives to exploring this ‘Zomian’ landscape and its ethnolinguistically diverse population. Indeed a historical frontier zone of refuge and opportunity, Houaphan’s forested mountains always constituted an escape option for people facing (Siamese, Vietnamese, lowland Lao, or French colonial) imperial interventions (Boutin 1937; Tappe 2015). Even today, the different ethnic groups of Houaphan demonstrate a wide range of flexible livelihoods such as swidden cultivation that carried them through times of crisis and war at the margins of lowland state formations, often seeking creative ways to keep state authorities at bay.

Phong pioneers: exploring the sociopolitics of mythology in upland Laos

“…The Phong share this trajectory – especially the close inter‐ethnic relationship with Lao and/or Tai communities – with the Phunoy of northern Laos, as studied by French anthropologist Vanina Bouté (2018, this issue). Neither Phong nor Phunoy fit into James Scott’s (2009) image of the ‘anarchic Zomian’ (Tappe 2019). Rather, they exemplify a history of contact, exchange, cultural borrowings and mimetic appropriation – but not complete absorption into the Tai‐Lao cultural realm (for a related study on the Khmu, see Évrard 2019).…”