2018
DOI: 10.21277/sw.v1i8.377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a model of social innovation: cross-border learning processes in the context of an ageing society

Abstract: <p>The aim of this paper is to reveal how the collaboration process mobilise resources among countries with different logics of welfare, yet address similar problems of ageing society, i a caring, a learning and a political perspective.</p><p>The study draws on social science theories and the analysis is based on qualitative empirical data from an interdisciplinary field.</p><p>The main conclusion is that a multi-dimensional understanding of dementia care by shared knowledge of di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The included studies were published between 2010 and 2019. Six of the studies had been performed in Nordic countries (Andersen & Bilfeldt, 2017;Bjerregaard et al, 2018;Gawell, 2014;Johansson & Stefansen, 2019;Rantamaki & Kattilakoski, 2019;Svensson & Bengtsson, 2010), and all addressed the welfare services research context. Three of the studies featured multiple study sites across various countries (Bjerregaard, et al, 2018;Casanova et al, 2019;Giraud et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The included studies were published between 2010 and 2019. Six of the studies had been performed in Nordic countries (Andersen & Bilfeldt, 2017;Bjerregaard et al, 2018;Gawell, 2014;Johansson & Stefansen, 2019;Rantamaki & Kattilakoski, 2019;Svensson & Bengtsson, 2010), and all addressed the welfare services research context. Three of the studies featured multiple study sites across various countries (Bjerregaard, et al, 2018;Casanova et al, 2019;Giraud et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies applied a qualitative methodology and, more specifically, case studies comprising methods like participatory observations, semistructured interviews, fieldwork, website analysis, process analysis, and document analysis (Bjerregaard et al 2018;Cools & Oosterlynck, 2019;Dai et al, 2019;De Rosa, 2017;Gawell, 2014;Giraud et al, 2015;Johansson & Stefansen, 2019;Lindsay et al, 2019;Rantamaki & Kattilakoski, 2019;Sabato et al, 2017;Sabato and Verschraegen, 2019;Shier & Handy, 2016;Svensson & Bengtsson, 2010;Weinzierl et al, 2016;Visentin, 2018;Xie et al, 2019).…”
Section: Welfare Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory of Community of Practices (CoP) suggests that learning in groups is a key to professional development [10,[32][33][34][35], providing possible new insights from colleagues and allowing for the development of common definitions for further scientific collaboration partners who are equally responsible and involved. It also allows for inspiration and new network constellations, as well as developing professional understanding by exchanging view; e.g., learning through the stimulation of being in a new community of reflection and learning practice (and culture) may create a new framework for innovative learning through collaboration, not the least of which achieved in the process of sharing one's unique personal experiences, professional knowledge and frames of references [35]. Working in a CoP builds a collective knowledge base in each member, which has the potential to improve the individual contribution.…”
Section: Toward Interdisciplinary Research Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working in a CoP builds a collective knowledge base in each member, which has the potential to improve the individual contribution. By creating an interdisciplinary learning environment, it can bridge, connect and make meaning [35].…”
Section: Toward Interdisciplinary Research Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the research process, I was guided by the thesis that 'the scientific method, as applied to social sciences, includes a variety of research approaches, tools, and techniques, for collecting and analysing qualitative or quantitative data (...) The scientific method operates primarily at the empirical level of research' (Bhattacherjee, 2012, p. 14), e.g., how to ma�e observations and interviews, and how to analyse these observations and these transcriptions of interviews. It was important to me that the model created includes a political, a learning, and a caring perspective (Bjerregaard, Maciuls�yte, Acien�, Christensen, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%