2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2015.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a multi-source fusion approach for eye movement-driven recognition

Abstract: 26This paper presents a research for the use of multi-source information fusion in the field of eye 27 movement biometrics. In the current state-of-the-art, there are different techniques developed to 28 extract the physical and the behavioral biometric characteristics of the eye movements. In this work, 29we explore the effects from the multi-source fusion of the heterogeneous information extracted by 30 different biometric algorithms under the presence of diverse visual stimuli. We propose a two-stage 31 fus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These matrices will be combined to generate a single similarity score for each pairwise comparison, which will be used to perform the biometric recognition. In this work, we evaluate four fusion schemes for the combination of similarity scores: the Simple Mean-or Sum-(SM) [Snelick et al 2005], the Weighted Mean based on Rank-1 IR performance (WM) [Rigas et al 2015], the Random Forests (RF) scheme [Breiman 2001], and the Likelihood Ratio (LR) scheme [Nandakumar et al 2008]. To train the parameters of the WM, RF, and LR fusion algorithms, we used the development dataset (see Section 4.1).…”
Section: Modeling Of Saccadic Acceleration Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These matrices will be combined to generate a single similarity score for each pairwise comparison, which will be used to perform the biometric recognition. In this work, we evaluate four fusion schemes for the combination of similarity scores: the Simple Mean-or Sum-(SM) [Snelick et al 2005], the Weighted Mean based on Rank-1 IR performance (WM) [Rigas et al 2015], the Random Forests (RF) scheme [Breiman 2001], and the Likelihood Ratio (LR) scheme [Nandakumar et al 2008]. To train the parameters of the WM, RF, and LR fusion algorithms, we used the development dataset (see Section 4.1).…”
Section: Modeling Of Saccadic Acceleration Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These rates are generally within 1% and 6-7% for any kind of authentication except for the iris-based ones, which have 0.01% EER but -like most classical biometrics -are not renewable and are vulnerable to theft. Even multimodal biometricswhere one uses multiple sources and biometric features for liveness detection and improved error rates [41] rarely improve below 0.2% EER [8,16,42]. Making the strong assumption that the user data are quite well-distributedwhich is far from guaranteedthis corresponds to a min-entropy below 7 bits, on par with typical password systems.…”
Section: Error Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lately, the efficiency of a multi-stimulus and multi-biometric fusion scheme for eye movement-based biometrics was demonstrated by Rigas et al [49]. The performances of different methods for data recorded for diverse visual stimuli ("jumping" point-of-light, text, and video) were efficiently combined via a weighted fusion scheme, for achieving a Rank-1 IR of 88.6% and EER of 5.8% for a large database of 320 subjects.…”
Section: The First Use Of Eye Movement Features In Biometrics Was Repmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the BioEye 2015 competition [28] was organized with the aim to further advance the conducted research in eye movement biometrics, and to address the emerging challenges in the field. Rigas et al [49], 2015 Multi-source weighted fusion scheme using methods [34], [43], [45] "jumping"-point-of-light, text, video EyeLink 1000 320…”
Section: The First Use Of Eye Movement Features In Biometrics Was Repmentioning
confidence: 99%