2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.01.12.21249685
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a platform for robot-assisted minimally-supervised therapy of hand function: design and pilot usability evaluation

Abstract: BackgroundRobot-assisted therapy can increase therapy dose after stroke, which is often considered insufficient in clinical practice and after discharge, especially with respect to hand function. Thus far, there has been a focus on rather complex systems that require therapist supervision. To better exploit the potential of robot-assisted therapy, we propose a platform designed for minimal therapist supervision, and present the preliminary evaluation of its immediate usability, one of the main and frequently n… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usability considerations (e.g., in the form of user-centered design involving patients in the development process (Meyer et al, 2019)) should be taken into account not only at the level of the hardware (e.g., how to turn it on/off, how to don/doff a device, etc.) but also at the level of the software and graphical user interface, which should be intuitive and easy to navigate for nonexperts in computer use, or patients with cognitive deficits (Ranzani et al, 2021). User archetypes created through data generated from actual target users might increase the potential for better design of technology-assisted interventions in stroke rehabilitation (Haldane et al, 2019).…”
Section: Technical Requirements and Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Usability considerations (e.g., in the form of user-centered design involving patients in the development process (Meyer et al, 2019)) should be taken into account not only at the level of the hardware (e.g., how to turn it on/off, how to don/doff a device, etc.) but also at the level of the software and graphical user interface, which should be intuitive and easy to navigate for nonexperts in computer use, or patients with cognitive deficits (Ranzani et al, 2021). User archetypes created through data generated from actual target users might increase the potential for better design of technology-assisted interventions in stroke rehabilitation (Haldane et al, 2019).…”
Section: Technical Requirements and Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common digital therapy platform offers the unique advantage of sharing user-interaction features between devices, to improve usability and help seamlessly transition from one device to the other (e.g., within a therapy session, or over the course of rehabilitation). Figure 2 presents a possible set of selected user-friendly, mobile, complementary robotic systems targeting different components of the upper limb, that could be used as a basis to implement such a connected RehabGym concept (Chua et al, 2018;Butzer et al, 2020;Lambelet et al, 2020;Ranzani et al, 2020;Ranzani et al, 2021).…”
Section: Towards a Connected Rehabgymmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of robotic devices is currently mainly limited to short therapy sessions in the clinics under constant supervision of specialized therapists, which limits their potential as a vector to increase therapy dose. One way to achieve this objective could be to use such technology within minimally supervised (i.e., therapy performed by a single patient or a group of patients with minimal external supervision or intervention [14,15]) or unsupervised (i.e., therapy performed without external supervision or intervention) robot-assisted therapy programs that could start in the clinic [14,16] and continue at home after discharge [6, [17][18][19][20]. Unfortunately, to make the step into the home environment of neurological subjects, current robotic devices should be rethought to guarantee simplicity of use, adaptability to different users and ergonomics, affordability and scalability, safety and portability [7,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, only few robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation have been proposed and tested for home use [18,19,[24][25][26], often without reporting their technical evaluation. Furthermore, little is known about their usability, which is fundamental to optimize the device development based on the user needs [27], as well as increase acceptance and user compliance to a therapy plan [15,21,[28][29][30], which is of key importance when targeting unsupervised use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7]. In the context of assistive devices, the SUS has been widely used as an evaluation tool for telerehabilitation systems [8] and robot-assisted devices [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%