2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-8043(99)00244-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a proper modeling of detector and source characteristics in Monte Carlo simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the MC simulations consider the detailed characteristics of the source-to-detector system in calculating the photopeak efficiency. This approach (MC) is inadequate in its accuracy because of the inaccuracy in the parameters accompanying the detector's geometrical dimensions and the structure of the sample [2]. The accuracy is also affected by the uncertainty in nuclear data and the calculation uncertainties of the MC code [3], but these are likely to be as important as the parameters linked with the detector's geometrical dimensions and the material composition of the sample.…”
Section: Theoretical Viewpointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the MC simulations consider the detailed characteristics of the source-to-detector system in calculating the photopeak efficiency. This approach (MC) is inadequate in its accuracy because of the inaccuracy in the parameters accompanying the detector's geometrical dimensions and the structure of the sample [2]. The accuracy is also affected by the uncertainty in nuclear data and the calculation uncertainties of the MC code [3], but these are likely to be as important as the parameters linked with the detector's geometrical dimensions and the material composition of the sample.…”
Section: Theoretical Viewpointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the attenuation in such a thin layer is negligible for most of the energies. Hardy et al [11] adjust this thickness to 26 experimental data for very low energies. For higher energies, the thickness of the dead layer at the inner n+ contact will still affect the efficiency due to its effect on the active volume.…”
Section: Dead Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, another approach for adjusting the efficiency of the Monte Carlo simulations to match experimental values is tweaking the dimensions of the crystal itself [12,[14][15][16]21,[25][26][27][28]. Alternatively, the uncertainty in the physical dimensions of the crystal can be reduced by radiography of the detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of measurements were carried out placing the sources corresponding to single-line emitters at different distances along the detector axis and perpendicular to it. Various detector parameters were modified in order to obtain a better agreement between experimental and calculated efficiencies following the procedure described in García-Talavera et al (2000). In Table 1 the results obtained for the 137 Cs efficiencies are presented.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulation Of the Detector's Responsementioning
confidence: 99%