International Test Conference 1999. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37034)
DOI: 10.1109/test.1999.805786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a standard for embedded core test: an example

Abstract: Integrated circuits are increasingly designed by embedding pre-designed reusable cores. IEEE P1500 Standard for Embedded Core Test (SECT) is a skndard-under-development that aims at improving ease of reuse and facilitating interoperability with respect to the test of such core-based ICs, especially if they contain cores from different sources. This paper briefly describes IEEE P1500, and illustrates through a simplified example its dual compliance concept, its Scalable Hardware Architecture, and its Core Test … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A standard under development is the IEEE P1500 Standard for Embedded Core Test, consisting of a Core Test Language and a Core Test Wrapper [10] (Figure 5). The P1500 wrapper is similar to the TestShell.…”
Section: Test Wrapper Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard under development is the IEEE P1500 Standard for Embedded Core Test, consisting of a Core Test Language and a Core Test Wrapper [10] (Figure 5). The P1500 wrapper is similar to the TestShell.…”
Section: Test Wrapper Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of a system under test is given in Figure 1 where each core is placed in a wrapper such as TestShell [15] or P1500 [16] …”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ease test access the cores can be placed in wrappers such as Boundary scan [3], TestShell [20] or P1500 [15,21]. The Boundary scan technique, developed for PCB designs, suffers from long testing time due to the shifting process, and it becomes even worse for SOC designs since the amount of test data to be transported increases.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a delay may be introduced when the core is in transparent mode or its by-pass structure is used as in the TestShell [21]. On the other hand, Marinissen et al recently proposed a library of wrapper cells allowing a flexible design where it is possible to design non-clocked bypass structures of TAM width [22].…”
Section: Test Access Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%