“…In the existing literature, different phenomena and principles have been described and empirically tested that predict a relationship between esthetic pleasure and certain (levels of) product dimensions (e.g., moderate complexity, preference‐for‐prototypes, moderate congruity, MAYA; Berlyne, ; Loewy, ; Mandler, ; Meyers‐Levy & Tybout, ; Noseworthy & Trudel, ; Veryzer & Hutchinson, ). These esthetic principles and phenomena distinguish themselves from each other based on how a product design is processed in relation to different reference points (Berghman & Hekkert, ; Hekkert, ). For example, the general preference‐for moderate complexity and the unity‐in‐variety principle are the result of processing intrinsic properties of a product design (Cupchik, Spiegel, & Shereck, ; Fechner, ; Post, Blijlevens, & Hekkert, ), whereas the moderate congruity theory and the MAYA principle result from comparing a design with other members of a product category that are stored in a person's knowledge system.…”