2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a unified model of aesthetic pleasure in design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of this new, social, principle was guided by the evolutionary explanation for esthetic pleasure and the workings of existing esthetic principles. This evolutionary explanation pertains specifically to “maximizing” esthetic principles that hinge on the need to provide a balance in opposite design dimensions that accordingly enable people to fulfill basic evolutionary needs for safety and accomplishment (Berghman & Hekkert, ; Lindgaard & Whitfield, ). Two social needs that align with these evolutionary needs are the needs for connectedness and autonomy and these, therefore, formed the basis for the new social esthetic principle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The development of this new, social, principle was guided by the evolutionary explanation for esthetic pleasure and the workings of existing esthetic principles. This evolutionary explanation pertains specifically to “maximizing” esthetic principles that hinge on the need to provide a balance in opposite design dimensions that accordingly enable people to fulfill basic evolutionary needs for safety and accomplishment (Berghman & Hekkert, ; Lindgaard & Whitfield, ). Two social needs that align with these evolutionary needs are the needs for connectedness and autonomy and these, therefore, formed the basis for the new social esthetic principle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the existing literature, different phenomena and principles have been described and empirically tested that predict a relationship between esthetic pleasure and certain (levels of) product dimensions (e.g., moderate complexity, preference‐for‐prototypes, moderate congruity, MAYA; Berlyne, ; Loewy, ; Mandler, ; Meyers‐Levy & Tybout, ; Noseworthy & Trudel, ; Veryzer & Hutchinson, ). These esthetic principles and phenomena distinguish themselves from each other based on how a product design is processed in relation to different reference points (Berghman & Hekkert, ; Hekkert, ). For example, the general preference‐for moderate complexity and the unity‐in‐variety principle are the result of processing intrinsic properties of a product design (Cupchik, Spiegel, & Shereck, ; Fechner, ; Post, Blijlevens, & Hekkert, ), whereas the moderate congruity theory and the MAYA principle result from comparing a design with other members of a product category that are stored in a person's knowledge system.…”
Section: Social Esthetic Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Product form aesthetics is a key part of consumer perception because it is a way for consumers to naturally perceive and determine the form of a product. Through this simple and effective perceptual processing unity, aesthetic pleasure can be enhanced [82]. Smartwatches are considered a fashionable product, and consumers prefer to choose these wearable devices based on aesthetic constructs such as color, texture/touch, shape, overall appearance, and screen size, mainly because smartwatches can be used as a means of visual communication.…”
Section: Classification Of Product Aesthetics and Its Impact On Sustamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As monotonous designs cannot meet the diverse needs of users, more creative designs are highly valued by manufacturers as it directly affects the market sales and brand competitions [1]. The traditional design method mainly relies on the designer's experience and subjective cognition, the entire process is long, tedious and inefficient and some kitchen products with profiled modeling are still difficult to design [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%