2006
DOI: 10.1093/jigpal/jzk019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Abductive Reasoning in First-order Logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been used for abduction in (Nepomuceno, 2002;Reyes-Cabello et al, 2006), as an extension of the abductive approach originally presented in (Cialdea Mayer et al, 1993;Aliseda, 1997). In this paper, we define C-tableaux with respect to the set C of constants which defines a class of C-structures, rather than the cardinality of the searched models.…”
Section: The C-tableaux Calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has been used for abduction in (Nepomuceno, 2002;Reyes-Cabello et al, 2006), as an extension of the abductive approach originally presented in (Cialdea Mayer et al, 1993;Aliseda, 1997). In this paper, we define C-tableaux with respect to the set C of constants which defines a class of C-structures, rather than the cardinality of the searched models.…”
Section: The C-tableaux Calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The added novelty is that we combine two calculi used previously, but separately, to solve abductive problems. These calculi are based on semantic tableaux and resolution (Reyes-Cabello et al, 2006;Soler-Toscano et al, 2006b). Our approach is specially useful and hopefully interesting for abductive applications in contexts with finite domains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of particular interest to us are approaches based on logical criteria. But, though there are several proposals (most of them based on the idea of minimality [1,32,42]), it is typically argued that purely logical approaches are limited because they are unable to reason under uncertainty or to estimate the likelihood of alternative explanations. There are also approaches based on preferential orders over formulas or theories, but they have been also criticized because such orders are treated as external devices working on top of the logical or deductive part of the explanatory mechanism, and therefore seem to fall outside a logical framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that semantic tableau methods have been extended to modal logic[6,15], first-order logic[33,38], DL[28], etc., and in the same way we would be able to generate a cutting from them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%