2009 14th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iceccs.2009.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an Embedded Software Component Quality Verification Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CBSS approaches prove that software component descriptions can be used for measuring semantic properties [5,6,7]. However, unlike business systems, a direct application of such component-based development approaches on software components in real-time systems is yet not possible [10] as deriving abstract system configuration boundaries using UML design tools, in order to define end-to-end timing constraints, is a complicated task [20,25,36,37]. Hence, the development of robust measurement techniques becomes inevitable for obtaining a precise estimation of constraint complexity at the specification level and thereby quantifying the dynamic nature of automotive software components [29,30,38], and requires the employment of sophisticated methods and heuristics.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CBSS approaches prove that software component descriptions can be used for measuring semantic properties [5,6,7]. However, unlike business systems, a direct application of such component-based development approaches on software components in real-time systems is yet not possible [10] as deriving abstract system configuration boundaries using UML design tools, in order to define end-to-end timing constraints, is a complicated task [20,25,36,37]. Hence, the development of robust measurement techniques becomes inevitable for obtaining a precise estimation of constraint complexity at the specification level and thereby quantifying the dynamic nature of automotive software components [29,30,38], and requires the employment of sophisticated methods and heuristics.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a component-based development perspective, the issue of software complexity measurement of software components has already been addressed in terms of their interface structure, interaction and constraints associated with usage [5,6,7,16,23,30,49]. Approaches dealing with constraint complexity [5,6,7] are however very scarce, and typically only cover the structural aspects by means of static inspection of the software artifacts [36,37], rarely taking temporal constraints into account which restrict the expected behavior of real-time systems at run-time [10,20]. This paper presents a method for measuring the structural as well as the timing constraint complexity of automotive embedded software systems at the specification level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(AHRENS et al, 2011) established a specialized QM to conduct the evaluation of software architectures in the context of driver assistant systems. (CARVALHO; MEIRA, 2009) proposed a framework, which includes a QM, to support the verification of embedded software components. (JEONG; KIM, 2011) established a QM of lightweight components for embedded components.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, to evaluate their approach, a complex and real practical example from a different domain had it software architecture fully refactored using the established metrics in their QM. Carvalho and Meira (2009) proposed a framework, which includes a QM to support the verification of embedded software components. The framework is also composed of a metrics framework, a certification techniques framework, and a certification process.…”
Section: Quality In the Context Of Critical Embedded Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides ISO/IEC 25010:2011, it is also possible to identify studies in the literature focusing on proposing quality models and sets of quality characteristics for particular system domains, such as embedded systems (Ahrens et al, 2013;Carvalho and Meira, 2009;Sherman, 2008). These studies add quality characteristics relevant to a particular domain and adapt definitions of existing characteristics to better describe quality in this domain.…”
Section: Software Architectures and Software Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%