The outer membrane proteins (OMPs) of bacterial pathogens are essential for their growth and survival and especially for attachment and invasion of host cells. Since the outer membrane is the interface between the bacterium and the host cell, outer membranes and individual OMPs are targeted for development of vaccines against many bacterial diseases. Whole outer membrane fractions often protect against disease, and this protection cannot be fully reproduced by using individual OMPs. Exactly how the interactions among individual OMPs influence immunity is not well understood. We hypothesized that one OMP rich in T-cell epitopes can act as a carrier for an associated OMP which is poor in T-cell epitopes to generate T-dependent antibody responses, similar to the hapten-carrier effect. Outer membrane proteins (OMPs) mediate interactions between microbial pathogens and their hosts. Within the bacterial outer membrane, proteins exist in homomeric or heteromeric complexes that are dependent on covalent as well as noncovalent interactions. These complexes are essential structural components and also mediate central events in bacterial physiology and pathogenesis. For example, the extensive disulfide cross-linking of chlamydial major outer membrane proteins (MOMPs) (15,22,40) provides structural stability in the absence of peptidoglycan (14), and disulfide interactions among MOMPs regulate porin function (3). The Escherichia coli outer membrane contains a complex consisting of a large -barrel protein, Imp, and a small lipoprotein, RlpB, and both proteins are required for lipopolysaccharide assembly (39). Furthermore, protein complexes within the membrane, including sophisticated macromolecular structures, such as secretion systems and pili, are essential for attachment, invasion, and survival within host cells (33).How OMP interactions affect induction of immunity is poorly understood. Numerous vaccine studies have been directed at individual OMPs, but these OMPs had limited success compared to immunization using whole bacteria or intact outer membranes. For example, immunization with outer membranes from Chlamydia trachomatis, Francisella tularensis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Anaplasma marginale protects against bacterial challenge, whereas immunization with MOMPs from these bacteria does not protect against bacterial challenge (1, 8, 10-12, 16, 26, 29, 36). The immunologic importance of OMP complexes is demonstrated by the induction of protection against Leptospira by immunization using OmpL1 and LipL41 expressed simultaneously in the context of the E. coli membrane. In contrast, immunization with either protein alone in the membrane context or as part of a mixture of non-membrane-associated proteins is not protective (13). Understanding the basis for differences in the immunogenicity and efficacy of complexed OMPs and individual OMPs would enhance design and development of vaccines for multiple bacterial pathogens.We have hypothesized that bacterial OMPs act as a carrierhapten pair, with one OMP containing essentia...