“…7 (Bulmer-Thomas 2003;Devlin and Estevadeordal 2001). 8 (Devlin and Ffrench-Davis 1999;Devlin and Estevadeordal 2001;ECLAC 2011). 9 (Barbieri, Keshk, and Pollins 2009;Barbieri and Keshk 2012 One of the main contributions of this paper lies on the quantification of intraregional trade among Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, andPeru from 1912 to 1950.…”
Section: Intraregional Trade 1912-50: Data and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 (Devlin and Ffrench-Davis 1999) have analyzed the New Regionalism of Latin America stating what follows: "To sum up, intra-regional trade, because of its characteristics, associated with location and the diverse channels which facilitate such trade, complement the Latin American countries' linkages with the global economy and provide a dynamic context of technological apprenticeship, leading to greater international competitiveness and a more diversified, balanced pattern of specialisation." 20 (Devlin and Estevadeordal 2001, 6:8).…”
Section: Intraregional Trade In the Long Run 1912-2006mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 (Devlin and Ffrench-Davis 1999) High concentration on few low-value goods has been one of the main features for Latin American trade. According to the literature, the term of concentration/diversification in the region refers not only to the absolute number of products included into the exportation, but also to the inclusion of some manufactures into it, in contrast with the export of a very few raw materials to the developed countries.…”
Section: Product Composition Of Intraregional Trade Until the 50s: Wamentioning
permitted to increase intraregional trade between South American countries. The paper proves that intraregional trade during the years of world wars and the Great Depression achieved some of the highest levels verified throughout the entire 20th century, but tended to lost ground after these episodes. It also proves that -with the exception of some Brazilian exports-most of intraregional trade presented the same features than global trade: a high concentration on few products of very low value-added. The paper suggests that beyond the rhetoric of regional integration and the signature of different trade agreements, these features persisted from the 1950s to the late 1980s. This finding certainly asks for an explanation in a time when intraregional trade is again at the forefront of the economic strategy of several South American countries.
“…7 (Bulmer-Thomas 2003;Devlin and Estevadeordal 2001). 8 (Devlin and Ffrench-Davis 1999;Devlin and Estevadeordal 2001;ECLAC 2011). 9 (Barbieri, Keshk, and Pollins 2009;Barbieri and Keshk 2012 One of the main contributions of this paper lies on the quantification of intraregional trade among Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, andPeru from 1912 to 1950.…”
Section: Intraregional Trade 1912-50: Data and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 (Devlin and Ffrench-Davis 1999) have analyzed the New Regionalism of Latin America stating what follows: "To sum up, intra-regional trade, because of its characteristics, associated with location and the diverse channels which facilitate such trade, complement the Latin American countries' linkages with the global economy and provide a dynamic context of technological apprenticeship, leading to greater international competitiveness and a more diversified, balanced pattern of specialisation." 20 (Devlin and Estevadeordal 2001, 6:8).…”
Section: Intraregional Trade In the Long Run 1912-2006mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 (Devlin and Ffrench-Davis 1999) High concentration on few low-value goods has been one of the main features for Latin American trade. According to the literature, the term of concentration/diversification in the region refers not only to the absolute number of products included into the exportation, but also to the inclusion of some manufactures into it, in contrast with the export of a very few raw materials to the developed countries.…”
Section: Product Composition Of Intraregional Trade Until the 50s: Wamentioning
permitted to increase intraregional trade between South American countries. The paper proves that intraregional trade during the years of world wars and the Great Depression achieved some of the highest levels verified throughout the entire 20th century, but tended to lost ground after these episodes. It also proves that -with the exception of some Brazilian exports-most of intraregional trade presented the same features than global trade: a high concentration on few products of very low value-added. The paper suggests that beyond the rhetoric of regional integration and the signature of different trade agreements, these features persisted from the 1950s to the late 1980s. This finding certainly asks for an explanation in a time when intraregional trade is again at the forefront of the economic strategy of several South American countries.
“…En efecto, el aprovechamiento de las economías de escala, es una de las causas del fuerte crecimiento del comercio, en particular de productos no tradicionales (Devlin and French, 1998). Por tanto,…”
Section: Los Intercambios Comerciales Intragrupo En El Grupo De Los Tresunclassified
“…Existe um consenso de que reformas comerciais trazem benefícios de longo-prazo, derivados de ganhos de eficiência na produção e no consumo, como também benefícios não-econômicos (Devlin e French-Davis, 1997;Dijkstra, 2000). Entretanto, o processo de liberalização comercial envolveria também custos de curto-prazo para a economia, relacionados a impactos setoriais específicos (setores com elevada proteção seriam prejudicados) e dificuldades no balanço de pagamentos devido ao rápido crescimento das importações (Bruno, 1987).…”
Section: Alca: Oportunidades E Desafiosunclassified
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.