1980
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1161(80)90193-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an improved micronucleus test Studies on 3 model agents, mitomycin C, cyclophosphamide and dimethylbenzanthracene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, this test has been utilized worldwide, both in vivo (using rodent and fish cells) and in vitro (using a range of cell types). Previous studies have demonstrated that plant extracts can induce the formation of a micronucleus during cell division through clastogenic (resulting in chromosome fragmentation caused by breaks) or aneugenic (resulting in the loss of whole chromosomes during cell division) actions (Salamone et al, 1980). During the telophase, these fragments or whole chromosomes are added to smaller nuclei known as "micronuclei", that are separate from the main nucleus (Kirsch-Volders et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, this test has been utilized worldwide, both in vivo (using rodent and fish cells) and in vitro (using a range of cell types). Previous studies have demonstrated that plant extracts can induce the formation of a micronucleus during cell division through clastogenic (resulting in chromosome fragmentation caused by breaks) or aneugenic (resulting in the loss of whole chromosomes during cell division) actions (Salamone et al, 1980). During the telophase, these fragments or whole chromosomes are added to smaller nuclei known as "micronuclei", that are separate from the main nucleus (Kirsch-Volders et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). The reason for this variation in the time of maximum response is not clear; we have speculated that it is related to the uptake and metabolism of the agent rather than any fundamental difference in the interaction with the bone marrow (6). The problem raised by this finding is that some agents may not produce detectable increases at 36 hr but are detectable at 72 hr.…”
mentioning
confidence: 41%
“…The problem raised by this finding is that some agents may not produce detectable increases at 36 hr but are detectable at 72 hr. Indeed a new protocol devised to take account of this possibility led to three carcinogens that were not detectable at early times being detected at later times (6). Because the results even at late times were marginal, this result needs to be confirmed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five animals of each group were sacrificed 24 h after the treatment and the other five 48 h after the treatment. This protocol was chosen considering the observation that the time course of micronucleus production in polychromatic erythrocytes can be different for each of the chemicals studied (Salamone et al, 1980). The bone marrow from both femurs was flushed out using 2 mL saline (0.9% NaCl) and centrifuged for 7 min.…”
Section: Micronucleus Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%