2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an ontological representation of resistance: The case of MRSA

Abstract: This paper addresses a family of issues surrounding the biological phenomenon of resistance and its representation in realist ontologies. The treatments of resistance terms in various existing ontologies are examined and found to be either overly narrow, internally inconsistent, or otherwise problematic. We propose a more coherent characterization of resistance in terms of what we shall call blocking dispositions, which are collections of mutually coordinated dispositions which are of such a sort that they can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the first heading, Merrill sees some of the principles of ontological realism roughly along the lines of ‘How could such a strange amalgam of Aristotelico-Australian philosophical ideas possibly have import for the workings of serious scientific research?’ In fact, however, since the authors of this communication first began to collaborate in 2002, our ontology development methodology has been driven by needs and concerns not of philosophers, but rather of scientists building systems in areas such as hospital adverse event reporting (Ceusters et al, 2009, 2009a, 2009b), salivaomics (Ai et al, 2010), or the diagnosis and treatment of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (Goldfain et al, 2010). …”
Section: Bfo Dolce Sumo Cycmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the first heading, Merrill sees some of the principles of ontological realism roughly along the lines of ‘How could such a strange amalgam of Aristotelico-Australian philosophical ideas possibly have import for the workings of serious scientific research?’ In fact, however, since the authors of this communication first began to collaborate in 2002, our ontology development methodology has been driven by needs and concerns not of philosophers, but rather of scientists building systems in areas such as hospital adverse event reporting (Ceusters et al, 2009, 2009a, 2009b), salivaomics (Ai et al, 2010), or the diagnosis and treatment of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (Goldfain et al, 2010). …”
Section: Bfo Dolce Sumo Cycmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, endemicity that was a disposition in IDOMAL will be changed to quality of a population , and so will be the terms holoendemicity , hypoendemicity and mesoendemicity , which are absent from IDO. We have also changed resistance from quality to disposition ; although a good case was made for the fact that resistance is a disposition [ 19 ], we should nevertheless state here that resistance is in most, if not all cases a genetic phenotype. And without going into further discussions, we simply state that phenotypes are usually considered to be quality , possibly because of the fact that several of them are visible ( e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suite consists of the core IDO, covering terms and relations generally relevant to the infectious disease domain, and a set of domain-specific ontologies developed as extensions from the core [29]. To date, disease and pathogen specific extension ontologies have been developed for malaria [30], dengue fever [31], brucellosis[32], and Staphylococcus aureus [33, 34]. The primary purpose of the core IDO is to maximize interoperability between IDO extensions as well as with ontologies outside the IDO suite.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%