2019 Global IoT Summit (GIoTS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/giots.2019.8766400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an Ontology for IoT Context-Based Security Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dealing with sensory data is usually noisy and faulty, so we also need to model the Quality of Information. The common quality concepts modeled are properties such as Completeness, Correctness, Concordance, Currency, Plausibility [ 28 ], Security [ 29 ], Access control in cloud data [ 30 ] and Confidence in the provenance of the data, PROV-O (Provenance Ontology) [ 31 ]. Another model [ 16 ] considers two dimensions of quality in which some of the mentioned properties also are included: generic data quality dimension (Accuracy, Confidence, Completeness, Data volume, Timeliness, Ease of access, Access security and Interpretability) and domain-specific data quality dimension (Duplicates and Availability).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dealing with sensory data is usually noisy and faulty, so we also need to model the Quality of Information. The common quality concepts modeled are properties such as Completeness, Correctness, Concordance, Currency, Plausibility [ 28 ], Security [ 29 ], Access control in cloud data [ 30 ] and Confidence in the provenance of the data, PROV-O (Provenance Ontology) [ 31 ]. Another model [ 16 ] considers two dimensions of quality in which some of the mentioned properties also are included: generic data quality dimension (Accuracy, Confidence, Completeness, Data volume, Timeliness, Ease of access, Access security and Interpretability) and domain-specific data quality dimension (Duplicates and Availability).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DS4IoT (Gonzalez-Gil, Martinez, & Skarmeta, 2020) reused concepts from ST AC (Gyrard, Bonnet, & Boudaoud, 2014a), IoT SECEv (Gonzalez-Gil, Skarmeta, & Martinez, 2019 and IoT − P riv (Arruda & Bulcão-Neto, 2019). IoT SecEv (Gonzalez-Gil et al, 2019) reused concepts from IoT Sec (Mozzaquatro et al, 2015)/ COP ri (Gharib et al, 2020) reused concepts from P ri (Kalloniatis et al, 2008). IoT − OAS (Cirani et al, 2014) reused concepts from CoAP (Pereira, Eliasson, & Delsing, 2014).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Selected Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When talking about Quality of Information, categories or metrics are important to describe the details. There are five common metrics: Completeness, Correctness, Concordance, Currency, Plausibility [18], and Security [19]. In the CityPulse project (http://www.ict-citypulse.eu/page/), they extend the ontology and used five categories; Timeliness, Cost, Accuracy, Communication, and Security, each with a collection of sub-metrics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%