2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77028-4_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an Ontology of Security Assessment: A Core Model Proposal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A. Mozzaquatro et al representing information about security in the form of assets, threats and security mechanisms using expressive semantics [32]. SecAOnto an ontology validating knowledge on security assessment by concentrating on various security aspects addressing relationship between information security and software assessment build onto the top of STAC [33]. In our paper we propose context-aware security for smart healthcare system using ontological approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Mozzaquatro et al representing information about security in the form of assets, threats and security mechanisms using expressive semantics [32]. SecAOnto an ontology validating knowledge on security assessment by concentrating on various security aspects addressing relationship between information security and software assessment build onto the top of STAC [33]. In our paper we propose context-aware security for smart healthcare system using ontological approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Franco et al [28] present SecAOnto: an ontology that formalizes knowledge on security assessment, focusing on its aspects and particularities, addressing the relationship between information security and software assessment. Again, it is built on top of STAC and it aims at supporting methods based on rigorous assessment criteria.…”
Section: Security Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another paper [40] presented core ontology concepts for security assessment. This approach is general and does not comply with Common Criteria.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%