2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.10.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an oral influenza vaccine: Comparison between intragastric and intracolonic delivery of influenza subunit vaccine in a murine model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Montanide was only delivered by systemic routes. For col. immunization, mice were kept without food overnight and the vaccinations were performed using a 4.5 Fg dosing catheter (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA) (44). OVA was solubilized in PBS, mixed with Z3-14 or APols like MOMP and used as a negative control.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Montanide was only delivered by systemic routes. For col. immunization, mice were kept without food overnight and the vaccinations were performed using a 4.5 Fg dosing catheter (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA) (44). OVA was solubilized in PBS, mixed with Z3-14 or APols like MOMP and used as a negative control.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed when considering recombinant influenza antigen, Amorij, et al (2007) have shown that the intragastric delivery of recombinant H3N2 antigen alone induced low HI titres, which were significantly lower than the antigen delivered IM (Amorij et al, 2007). This can be attributed to rapid degradation of the antigen in the GIT and/or their poor uptake by appropriate immune cells (Devriendt et al, 2012).…”
Section: Oral Vaccination Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systemic immune responses are needed to meet regulatory criteria for vaccine immunogenicity. In oral vaccine studies using animal models, oral vaccination was shown to induce both systemic and mucosal immune responses as well as protection [99105]. The efficacy of non-live mucosal vaccines via oral delivery can be significantly increased by incorporating into enteric-coated gelatin capsules and copolymer microparticles, liposomes, or proteosomes [106], which are attractive targets for M cells.…”
Section: Mucosal Immunizationmentioning
confidence: 99%