2015
DOI: 10.1109/tc.2014.2308423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an Oscillator Based TRNG with a Certified Entropy Rate

Abstract: Abstract-We describe a practical and efficient method to determine the entropy rate of a TRNG based on free running oscillators that does not require outputting and analyzing the clock signals with external equipment. Rather it relies on very simple computations that can be embedded in any logic device such as FPGA or ASIC. The method can be used for the calibration of an oscillator based TRNG or for on-line certification of its entropy rate. Our approach, which is inspired by the coherent sampling method, wor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 This gives the ratio (period jitter over the mean period) σ T 0 = σf 0 = 1.6 0 / 00 , which is close to our measurements obtained by other more expensive methods in [19].…”
Section: B Experimental Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…7 This gives the ratio (period jitter over the mean period) σ T 0 = σf 0 = 1.6 0 / 00 , which is close to our measurements obtained by other more expensive methods in [19].…”
Section: B Experimental Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In our experimental setup, we have f 0 = 103MHz and according to the fit in Fig. 7 This gives the ratio (period jitter over the mean period) σ T 0 = σf 0 = 1.6 0 / 00 , which is close to our measurements obtained by other more expensive methods in [19].…”
Section: B Experimental Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The single delay line method, doesn't filter out the global noise and thus overestimates the jitter variance by a factor of 5. The counter Another related work is the coherent sampling method for jitter measurement presented in [17]. We don't see any problems with this methodology and the reported results are similar to those obtained by the Differential Delay Line method.…”
Section: B Intel Fpgamentioning
confidence: 66%