2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58793-2_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Automated Taxonomy Generation for Grouping App Reviews: A Preliminary Empirical Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These snippets, represented in VSM or BoW, are compared using similarity measure like Cosine similarity (Vu et al 2015a;Shams et al 2020), Dice similarity coefficient (Palomba et al 2015;Zhou et al 2020) or Jaccard index (Iacob et al 2016). These techniques support Searching and Information Retrieval e.g., to link reviews with issue reports from issue tracking systems , Recommendation e.g., to recommend review responses based on old ones that have been posted to similar reviews (Greenheld et al 2018), Clustering e.g., to group semantically similar user opinions (Vu et al 2016;Malgaonkar et al 2020), and Content Analysis e.g., to compare review content (Malavolta et al 2015a).…”
Section: Natural Language Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These snippets, represented in VSM or BoW, are compared using similarity measure like Cosine similarity (Vu et al 2015a;Shams et al 2020), Dice similarity coefficient (Palomba et al 2015;Zhou et al 2020) or Jaccard index (Iacob et al 2016). These techniques support Searching and Information Retrieval e.g., to link reviews with issue reports from issue tracking systems , Recommendation e.g., to recommend review responses based on old ones that have been posted to similar reviews (Greenheld et al 2018), Clustering e.g., to group semantically similar user opinions (Vu et al 2016;Malgaonkar et al 2020), and Content Analysis e.g., to compare review content (Malavolta et al 2015a).…”
Section: Natural Language Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-occurrences may be insufficient as phrases such as 'all the' may co-occur frequently but are not meaningful. Hence, primary studies explore several methods to filter out the most meaningful collocations, such as Pointwise Mutual Information (PMI) (Gao et al 2018b;Malgaonkar et al 2020) and hypothesis testing (Jurafsky and Martin 2009;Guzman and Maalej 2014;Da ¸browski et al 2020).…”
Section: Natural Language Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, during testing and designing of IMCSC, we apply the Pareto Principle (80:20 rule). The main idea is that the chatbot should respond well to the 20% of the highly repetitive use cases that are more than 80% of the volume of use cases [10]. For the rest of the use cases, we cover it with the default fallback intent which responds to all the improper user inputs.…”
Section: Whatsapp Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%