2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23123-0_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Cross-Modal Comparison of Human Motion Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, IMUs still have their own limitations such as susceptibility to noise and limited dynamic range. The accuracy of inertial sensor-based estimation can be improved by using zero velocity updates as in [ 7 ], or taking advantage of the relative position and attitude of multiple sensors [ 8 , 9 ]. In [ 7 ], a robot arm control with an automatic calibration function based on inertial sensors is proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, IMUs still have their own limitations such as susceptibility to noise and limited dynamic range. The accuracy of inertial sensor-based estimation can be improved by using zero velocity updates as in [ 7 ], or taking advantage of the relative position and attitude of multiple sensors [ 8 , 9 ]. In [ 7 ], a robot arm control with an automatic calibration function based on inertial sensors is proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors state that the drift of the sensors is clearly removed by applying zero velocity updates. In [ 8 ], Helten et al introduce another way which takes into account the relative position and attitude of multiple sensors to improve the accuracy of human motion estimation. Using the same method, Tao et al [ 9 ] estimate limb movement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%