2014
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra10375k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards defining new nano-descriptors: extracting morphological features from transmission electron microscopy images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, everywhere in our surroundings we increasingly make (purposefully or by accident, as in 3D printing) nanoscale shape ensembles, that possess complex features on length-scales comparable to the particle itself [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] . Also, advancing synthetic methods now potentially offer "unlimited" freedom to controllably make a new universe of such complex geometrical ensembles that cannot be described, recognized or characterized with only a few length parameters [36][37][38][39][40][41][42] . We currently find ourselves unable to even name and share information, let alone carry out many systematic investigations of them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, everywhere in our surroundings we increasingly make (purposefully or by accident, as in 3D printing) nanoscale shape ensembles, that possess complex features on length-scales comparable to the particle itself [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] . Also, advancing synthetic methods now potentially offer "unlimited" freedom to controllably make a new universe of such complex geometrical ensembles that cannot be described, recognized or characterized with only a few length parameters [36][37][38][39][40][41][42] . We currently find ourselves unable to even name and share information, let alone carry out many systematic investigations of them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the development of nano-QSARs has been affected by a lack of data and knowledge of NM mechanisms of toxicity that make development and validation of computational models very challenging (Fourches et al 2010(Fourches et al , 2011Puzyn et al 2010). Indeed, as a move in that direction, in one study surface morphological parameters were successfully extracted from TEM images of NPs through the use of digital image processing methods for subsequent application in QSAR models (Bigdeli et al 2014). As a way forward, there have been proposals to convert images from scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and atomic force microscopy into matrices in which the numerical values correspond to individual pixels of the original pictures (Puzyn et al 2009).…”
Section: Applicability Of Qsar Models To Predict the Bioaccumulation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a way forward, there have been proposals to convert images from scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and atomic force microscopy into matrices in which the numerical values correspond to individual pixels of the original pictures (Puzyn et al 2009). Indeed, as a move in that direction, in one study surface morphological parameters were successfully extracted from TEM images of NPs through the use of digital image processing methods for subsequent application in QSAR models (Bigdeli et al 2014).…”
Section: Applicability Of Qsar Models To Predict the Bioaccumulation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] Predictive models based on experimentally measured or theoretically calculated descriptors that encode NMs structural characteristics, can be built to predict a property or activity of interest. [3,15,16] However, only a few such models and tools have been proposed to date in the nanoinformatics field for the prediction of properties or activities of NMs. [8,[16][17][18][19][20][21] One promising approach is to develop computational tools that extract additional information from existing experimental datasets, i.e., to enrich the experimental datasets with computationally determined descriptors, thus maximizing the utility of the experimental datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%