Abstract. When a disaster strikes, response teams can nowadays rely on
recent advances in technology. This approach improves the definition of a
disaster management strategy. The use of autonomous systems during rescue
operations allows, for example, to reach places that may be inaccessible or
dangerous to human rescuers. In this context, both the design and the
configuration of an autonomous system, including its embedded instruments
(e.g. sensors), play a very important role in the overall outcome of the
rescue mission. An incorrect configuration can lead to the acquisition of
inaccurate or erroneous data and may result in incorrect information
provided to rescuers. How can we ensure that the configuration of the
autonomous systems is correct for a target mission? We propose to validate
this configuration by testing the behaviour of the autonomous systems and
their equipment in a virtual environment. To do this, system, sensors, space
environment (geometry, etc.), prevailing conditions at the intervention site
(weather, etc.) and mission scenario must be modelled in a 3D simulation
system. The results of these simulations allow to apply in real time the
modifications required to better adapt the configuration to the objectives
of the mission. These simulations must be performed prior to the deployment
of rescue teams to speed the development of a rescue management strategy. In
this contribution, we propose a protocol to enhance an existing simulation
environment to make it adapt to support disaster management. Then, we
validate it through a case study in which we show the approach to correctly
configure a LIDAR for a realistic mission. Such simulations allowed us to
quantitatively configure the parameters of the LIDAR mounted on an existing
disaster management rover, in order to keep the energy consumption limited
while guaranteeing a correct functioning of the system. Resuming, the
expected results are: (i) the assessment of the suitability of system for the mission, (ii) the choice of the quantitative features which characterize such equipment, (iii) the expectation of mission success and (iv) the probability
which the system survives and completes the mission.