2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icmit.2006.262285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Establishing Foundations for New Classes of Reliability Problems Concerning Strongly Innovative Products

Abstract: This paper proposes a conceptual framework to distinguish between different classes of reliability problems encountered in strongly innovative products. Next to the conventional (hardware and software) problems, new classes of failures have emerged with a wide range of often strongly related definitions, such as: soft failures, "No Fault Found" failures, "Fault Not Found" failures, "Cause Not Found" failures, nuisance failures. The fact that these new classes of failures do not have precise and orthogonal defi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The end result is many 'product assistance' calls at call centers, 'No Fault Found' labeled products at service/repair centers, returned products at dealers that function well, and to top it all, disconfirmed expectations of unhappy customers yielding damaged brand image of companies. The realization of this trend (Figure 1) was the starting point for making a distinction between hard versus soft reliability concerns 1,2,4,7 .…”
Section: Background On Soft Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The end result is many 'product assistance' calls at call centers, 'No Fault Found' labeled products at service/repair centers, returned products at dealers that function well, and to top it all, disconfirmed expectations of unhappy customers yielding damaged brand image of companies. The realization of this trend (Figure 1) was the starting point for making a distinction between hard versus soft reliability concerns 1,2,4,7 .…”
Section: Background On Soft Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our ongoing research on soft reliability [6,7,8] deals with the so called "broken expectations" of users [1], i.e. field cases where products are being returned, or being sought redress for, that in fact technically function well according to specifications.…”
Section: Soft Reliability In a Nutshellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on stakeholder requirements, qualitative data may provide information regarding the failures and the successes of the product-concept based on the match between product capabilities and user expectations (i.e. negative and positive disconfirmation of user expectations) [16], and further based on how the consecutive "phases of use" of the product are being experienced by the user [5]. The model we developed (a.k.a.…”
Section: Information Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%