2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.csi.2010.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards interoperability of i* models using iStarML

Abstract: Goal-oriented and agent-oriented modelling provides an effective approach to the understanding of distributed information systems that need to operate in open, heterogeneous and evolving environments. Frameworks, firstly introduced more than ten years ago, have been extended along language variants, analysis methods and CASE tools, posing language semantics and tool interoperability issues. Among them, the i* framework is one the most widespread. We focus on i*-based modelling languages and tools and on the pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…i* domain models are encoded using iStarML, an XML-based interchange format allowing model exchange among existing tools for i* [9]. The models may be created using any i* editor that generates this format, we are currently using HiME [10].…”
Section: B Maesos At Runtimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…i* domain models are encoded using iStarML, an XML-based interchange format allowing model exchange among existing tools for i* [9]. The models may be created using any i* editor that generates this format, we are currently using HiME [10].…”
Section: B Maesos At Runtimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mapping between those models based on this ontology and the IstarML [13] exchange format has been also defined. In this paper, the MM is described with a textual tabular format, but could also be presented in standard GORE graphical representation.…”
Section: B Measurement-oriented Requirements Engineering (More)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sat(a', M')  iemainIEs(a'): sat(ie, M'), applying Definition 2 over a' [2]  iemainIEs(a): sat(ie, M), since ie s is not added as main IE [3]  sat(a, M), applying Definition 2 over a [4]  sat(b, M), applying the IH [5]  iemainIEs(b): sat(ie, M), applying Definition 2 over b [6]  iemainIEs(b): sat(ie, M'), since b is the same in M and M' [7]  sat(b, M'), applying Definition 2 over b CASE 2. Main IEs addition.…”
Section: Induction Hypothesis (Ih)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is characterised by a core whose constructs, although subject of discussion in some details [2], are quite agreed by the community. A rough classification of the core distinguishes six main concepts: actors, intentional elements (IE), dependencies, boundaries, IE links and actor association links [3]. They can be used to build two types of diagrams: Strategic Dependency (SD) diagrams, composed by actors, dependencies and actor association links among them; and Strategic Rationale (SR) diagrams, that introduce IEs, with their respective links, inside actors' boundaries, and reallocate the dependencies from actors to IEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%