2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2004.02.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards landslide predictions: two case studies

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
66
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[50] Sornette et al [2004] verified the proposition of Voight [1988] that using the (L-t) model one could make a 10-day forecast for the Vaiont collapse. Also, these authors extended their study by using a Dieterich-Ruina friction model to obtain a hyperbolic relationship between the velocity of the slide and the collapse time.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Blowup Time Estimate With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[50] Sornette et al [2004] verified the proposition of Voight [1988] that using the (L-t) model one could make a 10-day forecast for the Vaiont collapse. Also, these authors extended their study by using a Dieterich-Ruina friction model to obtain a hyperbolic relationship between the velocity of the slide and the collapse time.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Blowup Time Estimate With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This means in turn that the formula for the slide velocity proposed by Sornette et al [2004] is a good approximation of the theoretical one, equation (33) (Figure 6), and should be used for a first estimate of the relevant model parameters, as this was done in Appendix D.…”
Section: Veveakis Et Al: Thermoporomechanics Of Creeping Slidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So far, many models have been put forward (Saito, 1965;Voight, 1989;Crosta and Agliardi, 2002;Lu and Rosenbaum, 2003;Feng et al, 2004;Helmstetter et al, 2004;Neaupane and Achet, 2004;Sornette et al, 2004;Randall, 2007;Mufundirwa et al, 2010). They can be roughly classified into four categories: deterministic physical models, statistics models, nonlinear models and numerical simulation models (Li et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%