2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2006.255494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Opportunistic Fair Scheduling in Wireless Networks

Abstract: Opportunistic transmission scheduling schemes improve system capacity by taking advantage of independent time varying channels in wireless networks. In the design of such scheduling schemes, the fairness criterion plays an important role in the tradeoff of total system capacity and the achievable throughput of individual users. To meet different fairness demands with a unified opportunistic scheduling scheme, in this paper, we have extended the well known opportunistic scheduling scheme PFS into αPFS, which sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proportional fairness (PF) scheduling [7][8] was designed to balance the fairness and system throughput. An opportunistic fair scheduling, αP F S , was proposed in [9] to flexibly adjust the fairness performance by manipulating the parameter α. In [10], the selective relative best (SRB) scheduling was proposed for BE traffic, in which a proper tradeoff between the fairness and system throughput was fulfilled by jointly considering short-term channel gain and long-term channel gain.…”
Section: A Scheduling In Wireless Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proportional fairness (PF) scheduling [7][8] was designed to balance the fairness and system throughput. An opportunistic fair scheduling, αP F S , was proposed in [9] to flexibly adjust the fairness performance by manipulating the parameter α. In [10], the selective relative best (SRB) scheduling was proposed for BE traffic, in which a proper tradeoff between the fairness and system throughput was fulfilled by jointly considering short-term channel gain and long-term channel gain.…”
Section: A Scheduling In Wireless Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let h = 3, k 1 = 2, and k 2 = 3. Given that Ω(j 1 ), Ω(j 2 ), and Ω(j 3 ) are {SS 2 , SS 3 }, {SS 4 ,SS 5 }, and {SS 6 }, respectively, the probability that SS 1 obtains a transmission opportunity is given by (9).…”
Section: B Analysis Of the Service Probability For An Ssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], the authors propose to set β from 1 to ∞ . This method can both exploit multi-user diversity gains and provide flexible fairness adjustment from proportional fairness to maxmin fairness as β increases from 1 to ∞ .…”
Section: B Cell Edge Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can both exploit multi-user diversity gains and provide flexible fairness adjustment from proportional fairness to maxmin fairness as β increases from 1 to ∞ . In addition, it is proposed in [7] that c T in (2) should update with β . However, parameter β is not adaptive with time or with users.…”
Section: B Cell Edge Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, many fair opportunistic scheduling schemes have been proposed to provide different tradeoffs between system throughput and user level fairness [1][2] [3]. Among all the fairness criterions, proportional fairness (PF), which was originally proposed by Kelly [4] as an alternative for a max-min scheduler, is one of the most commonly studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%