Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/ccece.2005.1557124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards providing decision support for COTS selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Game theory [22] techniques for coalition formation have been applied. Works in game theory describe which coalition will form in n-person games under different setting and how the players will distribute the benefits of the cooperation among themselves [41].…”
Section: G Stage Seven: Analysis Of Agreement Options and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Game theory [22] techniques for coalition formation have been applied. Works in game theory describe which coalition will form in n-person games under different setting and how the players will distribute the benefits of the cooperation among themselves [41].…”
Section: G Stage Seven: Analysis Of Agreement Options and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In every coalition [22] and [40] note that there is empty coalition that is a coalition made up of no members (the null set φ) and a grand coalition N consisting of all the players. The benefit of a coalition can be quantified through the use of characteristic function.…”
Section: F Stage Six: Determination Of Coalition Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…are involved more often than not, authors propose the use of multicriteria decision-making techniques (cf. [4], [7], [9], [10], [11] and others) and typically recommend either the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) or the Weighted Scoring Method (WSM) to achieve this end. However, both methods come with serious drawbacks such as the combinatorial explosion of the number of pair-wise comparisons necessary when applying the AHP, the need of extensive a priori preference information such as weights for the WSM, or the highly problematic assumption of linear utility functions in both cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%