Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1718487.1718490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards recency ranking in web search

Abstract: In web search, recency ranking refers to ranking documents by relevance which takes freshness into account. In this paper, we propose a retrieval system which automatically detects and responds to recency sensitive queries. The system detects recency sensitive queries using a high precision classifier. The system responds to recency sensitive queries by using a machine learned ranking model trained for such queries. We use multiple recency features to provide temporal evidence which effectively represents docu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
134
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…older or newer). This behavior is different from the observed in other search services, such as in news search, where recent and updated information is preferred [19]; (2) highly relevant documents for a topic may exist throughout the entire search period, despite being known that some periods tend to concentrate more relevant documents [20]. -topical relevance for a given navigational topic.…”
Section: Relevance Propagationmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…older or newer). This behavior is different from the observed in other search services, such as in news search, where recent and updated information is preferred [19]; (2) highly relevant documents for a topic may exist throughout the entire search period, despite being known that some periods tend to concentrate more relevant documents [20]. -topical relevance for a given navigational topic.…”
Section: Relevance Propagationmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…But also in settings such as the web search engines where interactions are frequent and rich profiles are typically available, our approach has large potential value. The problem of fast changing content is well-known [66]. Perhaps the fraction of new users is small, yet they may be important enough to warrant extra effort, think of new users considering a search engine switch [239].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, query-level satisfaction metrics ignore the information about a user's 'journey' from a question to an answer which might take more than one query [120]. Al-Maskari et al [14] claim that query-level satisfaction is not applicable for informational queries -users can run follow-up queries if they are unsatisfied with the returned results; reformulations can lead users to an answer; this scenario is called task-level user satisfaction [66,97]. Previous research proposed different methods for identifying successful sessions: Hassan et al [97] used a Markov model to predict success at the end of the task; Ageev et al [9] exploited an expertise-dependent difference in search behavior by using a Conditional Random Fields model to predict a search success -authors used a game-like strategy for collecting annotated data by asking participants to find answers to non-trivial questions using web search.…”
Section: Evaluating User Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal aspects have gained traction in information retrieval (IR) over the last couple of years and have found applications in document ranking [7,6,9], query completion [22], query understanding [15,8,17], and recommender systems [24,5,21]. Shokouhi et al [22] analyse temporal trends and also use forecasted frequencies to suggest candidates for auto completion in web search.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, they propose a temporal link-based ranking scheme, which also incorporates features from historical author activities. Dong et al identify breaking news queries by training a learning to rank model with temporal features extracted from a page index such as the time stamp of when the page was created, last updated, or linked to [8]. Elsas et al analyzed the temporal dynamics of content changes in order to rank documents for navigational queries [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%