2017 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS) and 2017 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/sbr-lars-r.2017.8319463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards robotic cognition using deep neural network applied in a goalkeeper robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because the output of the semantic segmentation is in the same form as a lookup table based labelling approach, any already existing methods built on top of such a method can directly be reused. For instance, an efficient-and still task agnostic-connected component based method previously developed by us readily fits onto the architecture outlined here and performs the final object detection step within only 1 to 2 ms. N/A 11-22 Task dependent region proposal Cruz et al [5] 24 × 24 440 Task dependent region proposal Javadi et al [10] N/A 240 no loss: 6 fps; task dependent Da Silva et al [6] 110 × 110 8 Predict end-to-end desired action Hess et al [8] 32 × 32 50 Focus on generation of training data Schnekenburger et al [14] 640 × 512 111 GTX-760 GPU; 19 fps on i7 CPU Ours 640 × 480 5 L3F5M2S2 320 × 256 15 L3F5M2S2; L3F4M1.5S2: 20 fps By delaying the use of task dependent methods, one actually has an opportunity to optimise the segmentation output for such methods, by varying the threshold used to determine the final class pixels. For specific use cases it may be desirable to choose a threshold that represents a preference for either high true positive rate (recall), e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because the output of the semantic segmentation is in the same form as a lookup table based labelling approach, any already existing methods built on top of such a method can directly be reused. For instance, an efficient-and still task agnostic-connected component based method previously developed by us readily fits onto the architecture outlined here and performs the final object detection step within only 1 to 2 ms. N/A 11-22 Task dependent region proposal Cruz et al [5] 24 × 24 440 Task dependent region proposal Javadi et al [10] N/A 240 no loss: 6 fps; task dependent Da Silva et al [6] 110 × 110 8 Predict end-to-end desired action Hess et al [8] 32 × 32 50 Focus on generation of training data Schnekenburger et al [14] 640 × 512 111 GTX-760 GPU; 19 fps on i7 CPU Ours 640 × 480 5 L3F5M2S2 320 × 256 15 L3F5M2S2; L3F4M1.5S2: 20 fps By delaying the use of task dependent methods, one actually has an opportunity to optimise the segmentation output for such methods, by varying the threshold used to determine the final class pixels. For specific use cases it may be desirable to choose a threshold that represents a preference for either high true positive rate (recall), e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the cognitive operator will be implemented with planning and self-optimizing algorithms. Cloud computing principles, especially for robotics [30,37] (e.g., neural network applications [29]), will be evaluated with the DAEbot. The DAEbot will also be used in a multirobot network [38] (e.g., alongside the AMiRo (Autonomous Mini Robot) [1]) to test the multilayer robot cooperation capabilities of the presented architecture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the original OCM approach, our architecture implements the cognitive operator as a cloud service. The benefit of this distribution is that the local part can be equipped with processing units which are low on energy but also do not have the computing power to solve complex software algorithms (e.g., particle filters with a high amount of particles, or neural network applications [29]). The cloud part allows adding this computing power while not using the limited battery power of the mobile robot.…”
Section: Autonomy Vs Cloud Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%