Four new trinuclear copper(II) complexes, [(CuL1)3(μ3‐OH)](ClO4)2·H2O (1), [(CuL2)3(μ3‐OH)](ClO4)2 (2), [(CuL3)3(μ3‐OH)](ClO4)2·H2O (3), and [(CuL4)3(μ3‐OH)](ClO4)2·H2O (4), where HL1 = 8‐amino‐4,7,7‐trimethyl‐5‐azaoct‐3‐en‐2‐one, HL2 = 7‐amino‐4‐methyl‐5‐azaoct‐3‐en‐2‐one, HL3 = 7‐(ethylamino)‐4‐methyl‐5‐azahept‐3‐en‐2‐one, and HL4 = 4‐methyl‐7‐(methylamino)‐5‐azahept‐3‐en‐2‐one, have been derived from the four tridentate Schiff bases (HL1, HL2, HL3, and HL4) and structurally characterized by X‐ray crystallography. For all compounds, the cationic part is trinuclear with a Cu3OH core held by three carbonyl oxygen bridges between each pair of copper(II) atoms. The copper atoms are five‐coordinate with a distorted square‐pyramidal geometry; the equatorial plane consists of the bridging oxygen atom of the central OH group together with three atoms (N, N, O) from one ligand whereas an oxygen atom of a second ligand occupies the axial position. Magnetic measurements have been performed in the 2–300 K temperature range. The experimental data could be satisfactorily reproduced by using an isotropic exchange model, H = –J(S1S2+S2S3+S1S3) yielding as best‐fit parameters: J = –66.7 and g = 2.19 for 1, J =–36.6 and g = 2.20 for 2, J = –24.5 and g = 2.20 for 3, andJ = –14.9 and g = 2.05 for 4. EPR spectra at low temperature show the existence of spin frustration in complexes 3 and 4, but it has not been possible to carry out calculations of the antisymmetric exchange parameter, G, from magnetic data. In frozen methanolic solution, at 4 K, hyperfine splitting in all complexes and spin frustration in complex 4 seem to be confirmed. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2005)