Towards the Development of Quality of Life Indicators in the ‘Digital’ City

Abstract

Cities are central to the economic and social development of European society, not only because over 80% of European citizens live in urban areas, but also because cities are at the same time centres of production, innovation, employment, and culture, and loci of segregation, deprivation, and ethnic conflict. The emergence of a European-wide urban policy, has given new impetus to the need for comparable indicators of the quality of life to monitor development and policy implementation. This paper reviews the literature on quality of life indicators, and argues that traditional measures of the quality of life need to be supplemented with two new dimensions that reflect more recent postmodernist thinking about the composition of urban landscapes, and the contribution to the quality of life of the emerging information society. We argue that the challenges of building appropriate indicators reflecting these new dimensions are considerable, even in urban environments so rich in information systems and data sources, if they are to qualify as ‘digital cities’. There are difficulties in finding common workable definitions of the indicators themselves, as well as definitions of the relevant populations, including city residents, and users. By raising these issues and suggesting possible avenues for addressing these challenges we contribute to a much-needed debate on how to define such indicators, which is the prerequisite for their development and use.

Cross-Border Cooperation (CBC) in Southern Europe—An Iberian Case Study. The Eurocity Elvas-Badajoz

“…Other examples include the research conducted by Cao and Wang (2016) which explored the relationships between neighbor and twin cities [66], the work of Ballas (2013) [67] regarding life quality in urban territories, or even, in this research line, the survey studies/methods aiming to define measures and patterns put forward by Craglia et al [68], Mulligan et al [69,70], Lambiri et al [71], and [72]). The topic of CBC is also gaining momentum bearing in mind that borders have become places of intense activity due to increasing migration processes, motivated by several different factors, and also because border areas are historically places of intense development, benefitting from different but complementary catalysts for redevelopment as in the case of competition or cooperation.…”

How smart cities transform operations models: a new research agenda for operations management in the digital economy

“…The concept of the intelligent city is based on the way hard infrastructures are used N P T core characteristics helped Nam and Pardo (2011: 285) (Craglia, 2004;Nam and Pardo, 2011;Yovanof and Hazapis, 2009). Various examples of digital cities exist (e.g.…”

Urban data and city dashboards: Six key issues

“…It also wilfully ignores the 6 metaphysical aspects of human life which are difficult to capture as data suitable for inclusion in a dashboard and generally ignores the role of politics, ideology, social structures, capital, and culture in shaping cities (Kitchin 2014b). Indeed, they generally deal with facts, not with intangibles, processes, and complex, multi-scalar phenomena, and if used in isolation they decontextualize a city from its history, its political economy, the wider set of social, economic and environmental relations, and its wider interconnections and interdependencies that stretches out over space and time (Craglia et al 2004;Mori and Christodoulou 2012). As such, urban informatics produce a limited and limiting understanding of cities and how they…”

“…monitor and guide operational and policy practices with respect to specified targets; provide evidence of the success or failure of programmes and policies; discipline and reward performance; guide the development of new strategies; and shape spending patterns (Craglia et al 2004;Franceschini et al 2007;Behn 2014). An example of such an approach is Baltimore's use of CitiStat.…”