2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10755-015-9321-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the Inclusion of Students with Disabilities: Accessibility in Language Courses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, these students should not be excluded from L2 classes especially nowadays that learning at least one foreign language is considered imperative in the modern multi-cultural societies not only for typical students but also for students with LD. Inclusion of these students in the L2 classes will not only help them expand their linguistic knowledge but also enhance their feelings of acceptance and involvement into the learning process regardless of the level of achievement (Gallego & Busch, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these students should not be excluded from L2 classes especially nowadays that learning at least one foreign language is considered imperative in the modern multi-cultural societies not only for typical students but also for students with LD. Inclusion of these students in the L2 classes will not only help them expand their linguistic knowledge but also enhance their feelings of acceptance and involvement into the learning process regardless of the level of achievement (Gallego & Busch, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It often falls to language program administrators to raise awareness of the presence of SWDs and train teachers to accommodate them (Gallego & Busch, 2015), as has been the case with EDC program managers. Beyond the types of collaboration that occur among MT members as part of IEP implementation, further collaborative efforts are made both within and outside the university.…”
Section: Ongoing Collaboration and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is more, while a significant number of TAs (45.3%) claimed to have a certain degree of confidence concerning their knowledge of policies and legal mandates, a similar percentage indicated uncertainty regarding the referral procedures and about ways that they might gain students’ trust, overcome the fear of implementing accommodations in an improper manner, and handle individual cases (p. 393). In an additional study, TAs appeared to be implementing accommodations without supervision and making decisions without consultation with experts in accessibility services or their LPD (Gallego & Busch, ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Given what is often the very limited scope and duration of TAs’ professional pedagogical training, a substantial amount of a new TA's professional development happens fortuitously (Boyd & Boyd, ; Weimer, Svinicki, & Bauer, ), including, for example, questions about how to support diverse learners within the student body, approaches to differentiating instruction, or compliance with legal mandates determined by the Americans with Disabilities Act of (PL 101‐336) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of (PL 93‐112). American institutions of higher education make accessibility training available, primarily for full‐ or part‐time faculty and instructors (Cook, Rumrill, & Tankersley, 2009; Gallego & Busch, , ; Salzberg et al, ; Snyder & Dillow, ). However, the effectiveness of the training is often limited and rarely directed toward TAs (Gallego & Busch, , ; Houck, Asselin, Troutman, & Arrington, ; Rao & Gartin, ; Scott & Shaw, ; Sparks, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation