2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the pan-European bioindication system: Assessing and testing updated hydrological indicator values for vascular plants and bryophytes in mires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further estimated a water level value for each vegetation‐plot record in the data set by averaging the tabled hydrological indicator values for all individual taxa occurring in the record. We adopted the indicator values from the pan‐European study of Hájek et al (2020) that assessed for each taxon, at the scale of 1–12, the values for species optimum to water table depth, drought intolerance, flooding tolerance and ecological tolerance to water table (niche breadth). We averaged indicator values for drought intolerance, with both the ecological tolerances and the percentage covers of individual taxa used as weights.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We further estimated a water level value for each vegetation‐plot record in the data set by averaging the tabled hydrological indicator values for all individual taxa occurring in the record. We adopted the indicator values from the pan‐European study of Hájek et al (2020) that assessed for each taxon, at the scale of 1–12, the values for species optimum to water table depth, drought intolerance, flooding tolerance and ecological tolerance to water table (niche breadth). We averaged indicator values for drought intolerance, with both the ecological tolerances and the percentage covers of individual taxa used as weights.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We averaged indicator values for drought intolerance, with both the ecological tolerances and the percentage covers of individual taxa used as weights. Hájek et al (2020) found that these settings resulted in the strongest correlations with measured water level data in data sets containing different types of mire habitats.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on geographic coordinates, climatic variables (annual precipitation, mean annual temperature and number of hot days above 30°C) from 1961 to 2010 was obtained for each site using the CARPATCLIM database (Antolović et al 2013;www.carpatclim-eu.org). To characterize the water regime, we calculated the means of updated hydrological indicator values for vascular plants and bryophytes in mires weighted by ecological tolerances (Hájek et al 2020a). The traditional Ellenberg-type ecological indicator values (EIV) were used, but means calculated by the minimum value of the tolerance range (called 'drought intolerance' in Hájek et al 2020a) highly correlated with them (r = 0.95, P < 0.001).…”
Section: Environmental Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize the water regime, we calculated the means of updated hydrological indicator values for vascular plants and bryophytes in mires weighted by ecological tolerances (Hájek et al 2020a). The traditional Ellenberg-type ecological indicator values (EIV) were used, but means calculated by the minimum value of the tolerance range (called 'drought intolerance' in Hájek et al 2020a) highly correlated with them (r = 0.95, P < 0.001). These hydrological indicator values (Hájek et al 2020a) correlate more strongly with water level than soil moisture (Hájek et al 2020a).…”
Section: Environmental Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation