2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity after moderately hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated prostate radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, concerns regarding the potential enhancement of long-term complications in the organs-at-risk do remain. According to a recent systematic review and meta-analysis (24), most -but not all-previous clinical trials have shown that moderate hypofractionation may be largely equivalent to conventional fractionation with regard to GI toxicity, while pooled analysis of their data showed a trend to increased GI toxicity associated with hypofractionation. The latter finding was attributed mostly to dose-escalation rather than the hypofractionation itself (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, concerns regarding the potential enhancement of long-term complications in the organs-at-risk do remain. According to a recent systematic review and meta-analysis (24), most -but not all-previous clinical trials have shown that moderate hypofractionation may be largely equivalent to conventional fractionation with regard to GI toxicity, while pooled analysis of their data showed a trend to increased GI toxicity associated with hypofractionation. The latter finding was attributed mostly to dose-escalation rather than the hypofractionation itself (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a recent systematic review and meta-analysis (24), most -but not all-previous clinical trials have shown that moderate hypofractionation may be largely equivalent to conventional fractionation with regard to GI toxicity, while pooled analysis of their data showed a trend to increased GI toxicity associated with hypofractionation. The latter finding was attributed mostly to dose-escalation rather than the hypofractionation itself (24). In line with these findings, an earlier meta-analysis showed that dose-escalated HRT may increase late GI toxicity, when compared to conventional RT, whereas no dose-escalated HRT may actually lower the rate of late toxicity events (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients were treated with conventional fractionation (76 Gy at 38fx), but if they had been treated with the hypofractionated virtual treatment that had been studied, would they have had the same rectal toxicity? A recently published meta-analysis has shown that the moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules are equal, in terms of gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) adverse effects, to conventional fractionation, and that the increase in GI toxicity might be related to dose escalation rather than hypofractionation [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment planning and image fusion was performed using Monaco (Elektra, Stockholm, Sweden). In the Pareto optimization to spare the organs at risk, the rectum was given priority over the urinary bladder because toxicity at the rectum is the largest problem in routine clinical practice [ 21 ]. The radiation exposure of the organs at risk was taken from the cumulative plans for the total cumulative dose of 74 Gy, and the following parameters were assessed as relevant: for the rectum and urinary bladder, the mean dose and the percentage of the organ volume higher exposed than 50 Gy V 50Gy , V 65Gy , and V 70Gy ; for the rectum, the V 60Gy was additionally compared.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%