“…On top of illustrating the growth of interest in shape analyses in palaeopathology, our meta‐analysis also revealed key trends that summarize how shape analyses have so far been used in palaeopathology. Overall, we identified four such themes: - Describe pathological conditions and support/refute diagnoses (e.g., Berezina & Buzhilova, 2021; Berner et al, 2021; Colombo et al, 2018; Darton et al, 2015; DeSilva & Papakyrikos, 2011; Gunz et al, 2004; Hershkovitz et al, 1997; Milella et al, 2015; Rmoutilová et al, 2020; Slon et al, 2013; Thompson, 2014; Trinkaus, 2018; Vairamuthu & Pfeiffer, 2018; Viciano et al, 2017; Zhao et al, 2020)
- Understand how specific traits and shape characteristics predispose individuals to pathological conditions (e.g., Bédécarrats et al, 2021; Calce et al, 2018; Mansukoski & Sparacello, 2018; Mays, 2006; Plomp et al, 2012; Plomp et al, 2019; Plomp et al, 2020; Plomp, Viðarsdóttir, Weston, et al, 2015; Shepstone, 2001; Shepstone et al, 1999; Ward et al, 2010; Weiss, 2005)
- Identify and interpret adaptations and alterations in functional anatomy in response to pathological conditions (e.g., Berner et al, 2021; Churchill & Formicola, 1997; Gilmour et al, 2019; Lazenby & Pfeiffer, 1993; Licata et al, 2019; Micarelli et al, 2018; Roberts et al, 2004; Sparacello et al, 2016; Thompson, 2014; Trinkaus, 2018; Viciano et al, 2017; Viva et al, 2021; Zhao et al, 2020)
- Provide insight into aspects of physical and social experience, care practices, therapeutic interventions, and social organization (e.g., Bédécarrats et al, 2021; Chevalier, 2019; Cowgill et al, 2015; Formicola & Buzhilova, 2004; Gilmour et al,
…”