1985
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90443-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trace conditioning: Abolished by cerebellar nuclear lesions but not lateral cerebellar cortex aspirations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

13
114
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
13
114
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is consistent with the findings of the previous studies using peripheral CS in eyeblink conditioning that cerebellar interpositus nucleus plays an essential role in CR expression [4,27,29,31,66,70,71] . Steinmetz [72] speculated that the cerebellum may only be involved in simple, discrete, aversive, and somatic associative learning that occurs with a relatively short interstimulus interval.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It is consistent with the findings of the previous studies using peripheral CS in eyeblink conditioning that cerebellar interpositus nucleus plays an essential role in CR expression [4,27,29,31,66,70,71] . Steinmetz [72] speculated that the cerebellum may only be involved in simple, discrete, aversive, and somatic associative learning that occurs with a relatively short interstimulus interval.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The development of knowledge about the stimulus contingencies depends on the activation of reciprocal connections between the hippocampus and neocortex. Successful trace conditioning depends additionally on the participation of the cerebellum (Woodruff-Pak et al 1985). If awareness were directly contributing to the eyeblink response, participants should have awareness of their eyeblink responses to the CS + .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cellular recording and lesion techniques overwhelmingly support the role of the cerebellum in modulating the acquisition and timing of the CR in EBC. Specifically, non-human experiments have determined that activation of the CR is principally controlled by the cerebellar deep nuclei, specifically the interpositus nucleus (McCormick and Thompson, 1984a;Woodruff-Pak et al, 1985;Steinmetz et al, 1991;Sears and Steinmetz, 1991). Inhibitory projections from Purkinje cortical neurons modulate the activity of the interpositus, effectively manipulating the timing of the CR (Mamounas et al, 1987;Bao et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%