1988
DOI: 10.1109/32.6168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trace specifications: methodology and models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though this specification model was developed independently (Boudriga, Mili, Zalila, & Mili, 1992), it bears much resemblance to Parnas' trace specifications (Bartussek & Parnas, 1978;Hoffman & Snodgrass, 1988) and their extensions (Jacob, 2010).…”
Section: Axiomatic Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Even though this specification model was developed independently (Boudriga, Mili, Zalila, & Mili, 1992), it bears much resemblance to Parnas' trace specifications (Bartussek & Parnas, 1978;Hoffman & Snodgrass, 1988) and their extensions (Jacob, 2010).…”
Section: Axiomatic Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Traces of various kinds have been widely used for specifying the behaviors of different types of systems ranging from ADTs [16,17] to processes in a distributed system [15,28]. In each case, elements in the traces are used to record information about important events in the system; the ordering of the elements in the trace represents the order in which the corresponding events took place.…”
Section: Specification and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation is pictorially represented in 2 and further discussed later in this section. Making suitable restrictions on the behavior of potential advice via the use of language constructs, minimizing the join point model, providing behavioral constraining assertions by adapting a rely/guarantee [39,18] methodology, which is the focus of our previous work [19,35], and using predicates and/or functions on specifications themselves as in [16], which is a focus of our future work, may help alleviate several of these obstacles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, our system uses a context-free grammar extended by attributes, known as attribute grammar [2]. This decision followed an in-depth review of several grammars and languages, including graph grammars [6], state transition graphs based on NLC [41], trace languages [21], and the aforementioned attribute grammars.…”
Section: Formal Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%