2017
DOI: 10.3390/w9020137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracer Experiments and Hydraulic Performance Improvements in a Treatment Pond

Abstract: Abstract:The treatment efficiency of a wetland constructed for nutrient removal depends strongly on the flow patterns and residence times of the wetland. In this study, a tracer experiment was performed to estimate the residence time distribution and the hydraulic efficiency of a treatment pond with shallow and deep-water areas. Rhodamine WT experiments revealed a non-uniform flow pattern in the deep-water area and an overall poor hydraulic efficiency in the wetland. To improve flow uniformity and hydraulic ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Determination of the removal rates for a particular experiment were terminated when C t < 0.05 mg L −1 [35].…”
Section: Apparent No 3 -N Removal Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Determination of the removal rates for a particular experiment were terminated when C t < 0.05 mg L −1 [35].…”
Section: Apparent No 3 -N Removal Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, C 1 was the NO 3 -N concentration in the wetland mesocosm 24 h after simulated drainage was added to allow the system to be well mixed (mg L −1 ), t F−1 was the mean residence time or period the water was held within the wetland mesocosm system after the water was well mixed (24 h) until C t < 0.05 mg L −1 (d) [35], C F was the NO 3 -N concentration at end of the analysis (mg L −1 ), and D was initial average water depth (m). Once the J ZO was estimated using observed NO 3 -N removal datasets from the first 9 of the 18 mesocosm experiments, C t was predicted using the following equation for the remaining 9 batch experiments:…”
Section: Zero Order (Zo) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, conservative tracers are generally used to investigate hydraulic properties (e.g., tracking connectivities, flow pathways), analyzing travel times and flow velocities, determining recharge and discharge, and estimating hydromechanical properties (e.g., dispersivity, porosity). Common examples of conservative tracers under ambient temperatures are major anions such as bromide [17,18], stable isotopes such as 2 H and 18 O [4,19], dye tracers such as uranine [20][21][22], and rhodamine WT [23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Conservative Tracer Transport Versus Reactive Tracer Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated λ was approximately 0.21. This λ was compared with our previous study [22], which was from an on-site test and numerical simulation. The values of λ were all approximately 0.2-0.3 (Table 2), which indicates the reliability of the flume experiment.…”
Section: No Obstructions or Vegetationmentioning
confidence: 99%