2009 IEEE Aerospace Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2009.4839486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking a ballistic target by multiple model approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same ballistic objects adopted in [8, 12] have been used: three fin‐stabilised projectiles (respectively 60, 81 and 120 mm of gauge), whose attitude is maintained by means of small fins located in the end of central body and one spin‐stabilised projectile (155 mm) that is controlled by gyroscopic effect (in this case the natural stability of the longitudinal axis around which the rigid body is set in rapid rotation is exploited).…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The same ballistic objects adopted in [8, 12] have been used: three fin‐stabilised projectiles (respectively 60, 81 and 120 mm of gauge), whose attitude is maintained by means of small fins located in the end of central body and one spin‐stabilised projectile (155 mm) that is controlled by gyroscopic effect (in this case the natural stability of the longitudinal axis around which the rigid body is set in rapid rotation is exploited).…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The avail of identify a specific target within a set of several possible candidates suggests the use of an MMF [8, 11–13]. This approach is based on the idea that no single generic filter is able to correctly identify and track an unspecified target belonging to a large class of very different objects.…”
Section: Multiple Model Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specially during the first decade of twenty first century, many attempts [7], [8], [9], [10], [11] have been made to find out accurate and computationally effective tracking filter to track a ballistic target. The researchers used available advanced nonlinear estimators such as unscented Kalman filter [9], particle filter [7], [9], quadrature based filters [12], etc and compared the estimation accuracy among them and with the Cramer Rao lower bound [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One disadvantage of these methods is that they assume the ballistic coefficient, which is one of key parameters for target dynamics, is known with sufficient accuracy. However, the ballistic coefficient can only be known crudely or even unknown in practice [9]. In such a case, one idea is to consider that the target dynamics updates according to one of a bank of models, as the models can differ in values of ballistic coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%