2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020gc009463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking Deep Sediment Underplating in a Fossil Subduction Margin: Implications for Interface Rheology and Mass and Volatile Recycling

Abstract: fossil subduction interface records distributed de-10 formation across a 2+ km dominantly sedimentary shear zone. 11 • Subduction erosion of the overriding plate sourced ultramafic lenses, which were 12 subsequently entrained and underplated at depth. 13 • Periodic strain localization to the margins of km-scale ultramafic lenses facilitated 14 decoupling from the downgoing slab and underplating.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
73
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(345 reference statements)
3
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sediment prevalence at depth in the CMS interface shear zone, despite subducting along a sediment-poor, tectonically erosive margin, required stacking of thin incoming sediment packages through protracted underplating and entrainment (Tewksbury-Christle et al, 2021). Down-dip thickening observed in modern LVZs (Abers et al, 2009;Hansen et al, 2012;Toya et al, 2017) may be indicative of this progressive underplating process and may be independent of incoming sediment supply, contrary to previous assumptions (Hansen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Sediment prevalence at depth in the CMS interface shear zone, despite subducting along a sediment-poor, tectonically erosive margin, required stacking of thin incoming sediment packages through protracted underplating and entrainment (Tewksbury-Christle et al, 2021). Down-dip thickening observed in modern LVZs (Abers et al, 2009;Hansen et al, 2012;Toya et al, 2017) may be indicative of this progressive underplating process and may be independent of incoming sediment supply, contrary to previous assumptions (Hansen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 70%
“…Here we focus on the middle sheet, for which both the upper and lower shear zone boundaries are preserved, allowing us to constrain shear zone thickness. Tewksbury-Christle et al (2021) documented two phases of strain localization within the middle sheet. An early stage of distributed deformation occurred over ∼3 km thickness of dominantly schist (94%) with minor mafic blueschist and serpentinite components (Figure 2c).…”
Section: An Exhumed Subduction Shear Zone In the Klamath Mountainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations