2018
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2017-0184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking forest attributes across Canada between 2001 and 2011 using a k nearest neighbors mapping approach applied to MODIS imagery

Abstract: Mapping Canada’s forests is a significant challenge given their extent and the interprovincial differences in forest inventories. We created new sets of nationally consistent forest attribute maps for the years 2001 and 2011 by building upon previously published work with the objective to determine if sequential maps of forest attributes could be used to quantify changes over time. We first refined our previously published methodology of using the k nearest neighbors (kNN) prediction method and MODIS spectral … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding the remaining uncertainties, which are unavoidable with the currently available data, the present study involves several innovations that go far beyond state of the art in the synergy of satellite and forest inventory data for biomass estimation: Theoretical considerations on the sapwood distribution in the tree stem make it possible to apply relatively more frequent measurements of sapwood area for estimation of sapwood biomass. The application of a global stand density product (Crowther et al, ) enables the gap to be bridged between inventory measurements at the tree level and satellite observations at the forest stand scale. The application of a dominant tree genera map covering the boreal and temperate forests in Canada (Beaudoin et al, ), the USA (Wilson et al, ), Europe (Brus et al, ) and Russia (Schepaschenko et al, ) allows genera‐specific differences in biomass allometry to be taken into account. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Notwithstanding the remaining uncertainties, which are unavoidable with the currently available data, the present study involves several innovations that go far beyond state of the art in the synergy of satellite and forest inventory data for biomass estimation: Theoretical considerations on the sapwood distribution in the tree stem make it possible to apply relatively more frequent measurements of sapwood area for estimation of sapwood biomass. The application of a global stand density product (Crowther et al, ) enables the gap to be bridged between inventory measurements at the tree level and satellite observations at the forest stand scale. The application of a dominant tree genera map covering the boreal and temperate forests in Canada (Beaudoin et al, ), the USA (Wilson et al, ), Europe (Brus et al, ) and Russia (Schepaschenko et al, ) allows genera‐specific differences in biomass allometry to be taken into account. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to address the above‐mentioned research objectives, here we: (a) develop a theoretical framework to estimate sapwood biomass for a given stem biomass; (b) collect measurements of sapwood proportions from the BAAD, an additional extensive literature review and our own studies; and (c) derive a sapwood biomass map based on remote sensing products (accompanied by an uncertainty estimate), inferred allometric relationships and new products on the distribution of stand density and tree genera (Figure ). A global stand density product (Crowther et al, ) allows scaling from measurements at tree level to areal estimates, and this is supplemented with information on tree species distribution (Beaudoin, Bernier, Villemaire, Guindon, & Guo, ; Brus et al, ; Schepaschenko et al, ; Wilson, Lister, & Riemann, ; Wilson, Lister, Riemann, & Griffith, ) that enable the application of allometric relationships for tree genera in addition to the leaf type level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations