2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(06)14012-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking Individual Proteins in Living Cells Using Single Quantum Dot Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…QDs were selected for tracking analysis only if they were localized to photoreceptor terminals, exhibited a small size (≤4 pixels) and showed intermittent blinking; these criteria are consistent with labeling by a single quantum dot (Alcor et al, 2009). The location of a QD can be determined with precision exceeding the diffraction limit by fitting the fluorescence profile with a Gaussian point spread function (Courty et al, 2006). To estimate pointing accuracy, we measured the standard deviation of displacements exhibited by QDs immobilized in vacuum grease and found that they averaged 96 nm on the upright microscope (11 QDs, 100 measurements/QD) and 15 nm on the inverted microscope (10 QDs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QDs were selected for tracking analysis only if they were localized to photoreceptor terminals, exhibited a small size (≤4 pixels) and showed intermittent blinking; these criteria are consistent with labeling by a single quantum dot (Alcor et al, 2009). The location of a QD can be determined with precision exceeding the diffraction limit by fitting the fluorescence profile with a Gaussian point spread function (Courty et al, 2006). To estimate pointing accuracy, we measured the standard deviation of displacements exhibited by QDs immobilized in vacuum grease and found that they averaged 96 nm on the upright microscope (11 QDs, 100 measurements/QD) and 15 nm on the inverted microscope (10 QDs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These applications have inspired the use QDs for monitoring other plasma membrane proteins such as integrins [50,66], tyrosine kinases [67,68], G-protein coupled receptors [69], and membrane lipids associated with apoptosis [70,71]. As well, detailed procedures for receptor labeling and visualization of receptor dynamics with QDs have recently been published [72,73], and new techniques to label plasma membrane proteins using versatile molecular biology methods have been developed [74,75].…”
Section: Imaging and Tracking Of Membrane Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These advantageous properties overcome difficulties in photobleaching that limit fluorophore imaging time allowing for acquisition of biological events over long timescales and contribute to the QD’s utility as an ultrasensitive detection probe for SPT. Moreover, QD-SPT generates quantifiable dynamic information regarding diffusional properties, co-localization, and spatial and temporal heterogeneity of molecules inside living cells that conventional fluorescence and biochemical methods cannot capture (Courty et al 2006a; Cognet et al 2014; Breger et al 2014). …”
Section: Qd-enabled Studies Of Single Molecule Behavior In Living Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following labeling and validation of the QD probe, a sequence of fluorescence images are acquired in time lapse to capture the biological event. The temporal resolution achieved through this acquisition will usually be limited by the camera readout time rather than by the brightness of the probe (Courty et al 2006a). Finally, biological information is extracted from the recorded trajectories through single particle tracking to yield measurements such as diffusion coefficient and velocity that provide dynamic information about the molecule of interest (Bannai et al 2006).…”
Section: Qd-enabled Studies Of Single Molecule Behavior In Living Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%