1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1987.tb00149.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking of mouse cell lineage using microinjected DNA sequences: Analyses using genomic Southern blotting and tissue-section in situ hybridizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(21 reference statements)
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, pronuclear injection of transgene into fertilized oocytes of MRL-Fas lpr mice was performed to maintain a complete host genetic background, thereby preventing any issues related to genetic background. Although there might be a concern about the effect of integration sites of BAC on function, especially when multiple copies have integrated, a genomic-integration site of the transgene is typically confined to a single genomic site, regardless of the copy numbers (25). Furthermore, we revealed two independent tg lines of each group to avoid the risk that a DNAintegration site might reflect on different phenotypes in each group, which showed similar autoimmunity and mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, pronuclear injection of transgene into fertilized oocytes of MRL-Fas lpr mice was performed to maintain a complete host genetic background, thereby preventing any issues related to genetic background. Although there might be a concern about the effect of integration sites of BAC on function, especially when multiple copies have integrated, a genomic-integration site of the transgene is typically confined to a single genomic site, regardless of the copy numbers (25). Furthermore, we revealed two independent tg lines of each group to avoid the risk that a DNAintegration site might reflect on different phenotypes in each group, which showed similar autoimmunity and mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Because of the neonatal lethality of homozygous math1 null mice (math1 ␤-Gal/␤-Gal ), the mutant component of the chimeras was generated by mating math1 ␤-Gal/ϩ males and females to generate math1 ␤-Gal/␤-Gal , math1 ␤-Gal/ϩ , or math1 ϩ/ϩ embryos. The wild-type (ϩ/ϩ) component was generated from one of five different lines: ICR, Rosa26 (Friedrich and Soriano, 1991), Balb/c J , GTO (Lo et al, 1987), or math1 ϩ/ϩ . Experimental mouse chimeras were generated as described previously (Goldowitz and Mullen, 1982;Goldowitz, 1989).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, detecting GPI variants requires the destruction of tissues, which precludes detection of these variants at the spatial resolution needed to determine chimerism at the histological level. The first generation of genetic markers that were used for chimera analysis allowed cells of different origins to be distinguished by the presence of strain-specific DNA satellite markers (Rossant et al, 1983) or a large globin transgene insert (Lo et al, 1987). The use of these markers involves technically difficult DNA-DNA in situ hybridization of histological preparations of the embryo.…”
Section: Lineage Markers For Chimera Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%