2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2923757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking the Splitting and Combination of Group Target With $\delta$ -Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli Filter

Abstract: Splitting and combination are two important events of group target motion. However, the existing tracking approaches for group target splitting and combination events suffer the problems of high-computational cost and low accuracy. Under the random finite set framework, with target extent modeled by random matrix, the algorithms for group target splitting and combination tracking based on δ-generalized labeled multi-Bernoulli filter are researched. Three classical splitting modes of group target are discussed.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the convenience of analysis, we assume that the measurements have the same noise variance. Then substituting (24) into (22), the logarithm likelihood function of event A k can be expressed as:…”
Section: ) Novel Methods Based On Mglementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the convenience of analysis, we assume that the measurements have the same noise variance. Then substituting (24) into (22), the logarithm likelihood function of event A k can be expressed as:…”
Section: ) Novel Methods Based On Mglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have achieved good performances in extended targets/formation group tracking [21]- [24], but they have two main problems when modelling group outlines of LSTG:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the nominalQ k and the nominalR k may be inaccurate. It can be seen that an inaccurateQ k yields an inaccurate predicted state covariance P k|k−1 through (8), an inaccurate P k|k−1 and an inaccurateR k induce an inaccurate K k through (12), and an inaccurate K k and an inaccurate P k|k−1 yield an inaccurate m k and an inaccurate P k through (10)- (12). As a result, an inaccurateQ k and an inaccurateR k may lead to erroneous estimate x k , which is determined by the Gaussian parameters m k and P k .…”
Section: B Inaccurate Process and Measurement Noise Covariances In Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (16) provides the GLMB filtering density at time k . After the steps of new target adaptive generation and joint prediction and update, the GLMB filtering density at time 1 k  is…”
Section: B Prediction and Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…RFS is rigorous, elegant, and suitable for the multidimensional heterogeneous information fusion and semantic target information fusion scenarios to which traditional methods are difficult to apply. Led by Mahler and Vo-Vo, a group of outstanding scholars engaged in this work and successively proposed the implementation methods of probability hypothesis density (PHD) filter [11] and its cardinalized version, cardinalized PHD (CPHD) [12], the multi-target multi-Bernoulli (MeMBer) filter [8], [13], and the newly derived generalized labeled multi-Bernoulli (GLMB) filter [14]- [16] and its special case, the labeled multi-Bernoulli (LMB) filter [17]- [19]. Among them, GLMB filtering is based on the labeled RFS theory and strictly derived, which has better cardinality estimation accuracy and OSPA metric [20], [21] performances than PHD, CPHD, and MeMBer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%