2019
DOI: 10.1111/roie.12392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade in intermediate inputs, customs unions, and global free trade

Abstract: In a three‐country customs union (CU) formation game, I introduce international trade in intermediate inputs and rules of origin (RoO) restrictions. In the case of symmetric countries, I show that as countries become more involved in global supply chains, global free trade is less likely to be a stable equilibrium outcome. RoO can help solve this problem. In the case of asymmetry, depending on the degree of the globalization, free riding (for high degree) or exclusion motive (for low degree) prevents global fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper is closely related to Tsirekidze (2019), in which I study similar issues in the Customs Union setting. In addition, my paper is related to the recent literature on trade policy in global supply chains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is closely related to Tsirekidze (2019), in which I study similar issues in the Customs Union setting. In addition, my paper is related to the recent literature on trade policy in global supply chains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Development of international cooperation and use of transit potential of the customs space of a country (Afontsev 2014). -Intensification of professional development of specialists who will ensure the operation of the customs space institutional platform, including through distance learning (Tsirekidze 2019). -Introduction of innovative technologies in the activities of customs institutions, taking into account the challenges of the 4.0 industrial revolution for national customs spaces and the possibility of future physical movement of goods produced using 4D and 5D printers across the border, which significantly distorts the organizational and institutional structure of customs (Darling 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%