Trade liberalization in the presence of domestic regulations: public policies applied to EU and U.S. wine markets

Rickard, Bradley J.; Gergaud, Olivier; Ho, Shuay-Tsyr; Livat, Florine

doi:10.1080/00036846.2017.1386278

Cited by 10 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Most existing studies of wine trade focus on only a small subset of trading countries or consider wine as part of wider analyses. Rickard et al (2018) examine the impacts of bilateral tariffs by focusing on trade between the United States and Europe. Macedo et al (2020) employ a gravity model to analyze Portugal's exports of port wine to 60 trade partners.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wine: The punching bag in trade retaliation

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wine: The punching bag in trade retaliation

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Types of bilateral NTMs on wine imports differ across trade patterns (Table 5). Bilateral NTMs implemented by NWP have more than tripled during the period 1996-2016 (from 76 to 240 in NWP-OWP trade, from 81 to 300 in NWP-NWP trade) [26], while OWP, in general, adopt import tariffs rather than bilateral NTMs [27,28].…”

Section: Non-tariff Measures and Trade: Evidence From Wine Sectormentioning

confidence: 99%

On the effects of bilateral agreements in world wine trade

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the last decades there have been significant changes in trade regulations that are modifying the global trade of wine. The number of non-tariff measures (NTMs) adopted in the wine sector is relevant. Similarly, a large number of bilateral trade agreements have been adopted. Despite the regulation is heavy, the impact of these policy instruments on trade is not always clear, nor quantified at global scale. We investigate the effects that bilateral NTMs are showing on global imports of wine. In particular, we estimate a gravity model to explain how bilateral NTMs influence wine trade, and we disentangle these effects for different segments of the international market of wine. Our results suggest that bilateral NTMs tend to favour imports of wine. Differences emerge across market segments and types of regulations. In particular, the Technical Barriers to Trade favour (friction) bottled (bulk) wine; pre-shipment inspections enhance imports of bottled wine; the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards are the most trade-enhancing NTMs, regardless of the market segment.

show abstract

“…Studies specific to wine trade and policy include Anderson and Wittwer (2018), Rickard et al (2018), Dal Bianco et al (2015), and Heien and Sims (2000). Anderson and Wittwer (2018) examined the effects of Brexit and found that a hard exit from the EU would be costly to UK wine consumers.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Anderson and Wittwer (2018) examined the effects of Brexit and found that a hard exit from the EU would be costly to UK wine consumers. Rickard et al (2018) analyzed the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and found that wine tariffs were of limited interest in the negotiations. Dal Bianco et al (2015) examined the impact of trade barriers on global wine trade and found that decreasing tariffs have largely been replaced with more stringent technical barriers.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tariff Elimination and the Competitiveness of Wine-Exporting Countries in Japan

Greear

Muhammad

2021

Agric. Resour. Econom. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bilateral trade agreements between Japan and major wine-exporting countries have resulted in tariff eliminations in Japan. This raises questions about how tariffs affect the competitiveness of wine-exporting countries. The generalized dynamic Rotterdam model was used in estimating Japanese wine demand by source. Estimates were then used to project the impact of tariffs on imports of Australian, Chilean, French, German, Italian, Spanish, and U.S. wine. Tariff reductions primarily benefit affected countries, with limited adverse effects on competing countries. The elimination of tariffs on U.S. wine should offset any losses from competing trade agreements.

show abstract

Trade liberalization in the presence of domestic regulations: public policies applied to EU and U.S. wine markets

Cited by 10 publications

References 19 publications

Wine: The punching bag in trade retaliation

Wine: The punching bag in trade retaliation

On the effects of bilateral agreements in world wine trade

Tariff Elimination and the Competitiveness of Wine-Exporting Countries in Japan

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About