Trade secrets versus Cost Benefit Analysis

Hofmann, Ekkehard; Wangenheim, Georg von

doi:10.1016/s0144-8188(02)00117-5

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Simple Cost-benefit Analysis Model Of the Integration1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2005

Publication Types

Select...

Other1

Article1

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The valuations of CBA have supported choosing the best projects with 104 higher/ or positive social welfare. It also contributes significantly to decision makers in selecting better ways for sustainable development, so that it is regarded as a useful tool for decision makers (Dinkel, 1985;Hofmanna & Wangenheim, 2003;Simpson & Walker, 1987). Furthermore, Munda (1996) argued that CBA is necessary to place monetary values on non-market goods, such as: clean air, clean water, biodiversity and wilderness areas.…”

Section: Simple Cost-benefit Analysis Model Of the Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving Land Use Planning (LUP) by integration of landslide susceptibility: An economic case study in Maichau District, Hoabinh Province, Vietnam

Nha¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Simple Cost-benefit Analysis Model Of the Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving Land Use Planning (LUP) by integration of landslide susceptibility: An economic case study in Maichau District, Hoabinh Province, Vietnam

Nha¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intelligent building research: a review

Wong¹,

Li²,

Wang³

2005

Automation in Construction

315

148

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Should non-expert courts control expert administrations?

Wangenheim¹

2005

Law and the State

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Decisions of public administrations are often disputed in courts. Courts usually have much less expertise in the field of the decision than the administrative body whose original decision is challenged. Therefore the question arises whether administrative decisions which are handed down by experts in their field should actually be subject to court control. In this paper, I first show that control by experts may be better than no control at all, if review is triggered by an appeals process or if review increases administrators' incentives to hand down correct decisions. The simple model also shows that without the incentive effect, the error probability of reviewing courts should be lower than the administration's error probability. In an extension of the model, I discuss the reasons and effect of discretionary ranges for administrative decisions.

show abstract

Trade secrets versus Cost Benefit Analysis

Cited by 3 publications

References 17 publications

Improving Land Use Planning (LUP) by integration of landslide susceptibility: An economic case study in Maichau District, Hoabinh Province, Vietnam

Improving Land Use Planning (LUP) by integration of landslide susceptibility: An economic case study in Maichau District, Hoabinh Province, Vietnam

Intelligent building research: a review

Should non-expert courts control expert administrations?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About