2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tradeoffs between Dense and Replicate Sampling Strategies for High-Throughput Time Series Experiments

Abstract: An important experimental design question for high throughout time series studies is the number of replicates required for accurate reconstruction of the profiles. Due to budget and sample availability constraints, more replicates imply fewer time points and vice versa. We analyze the performance of dense and replicate sampling by developing a theoretical framework that focuses on a restricted yet expressive set of possible curves over a wide range of noise levels and by analyzing real expression data. For bot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these, however, use either static or traditional time series analyses on self-contained temporal data sets with a limited number of time points (Zinman et al, 2013). Generating additional time points for such analyses involves a cost-benefit tradeoff that has recently been explored (Sefer et al, 2016). Although there is typically greater benefit from adding time points at the expense of replicates, the costs of sampling adequately to identify medically-relevant changes in temporal dynamics may be prohibitive, especially when the dynamic 13 processes are not already well understood.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these, however, use either static or traditional time series analyses on self-contained temporal data sets with a limited number of time points (Zinman et al, 2013). Generating additional time points for such analyses involves a cost-benefit tradeoff that has recently been explored (Sefer et al, 2016). Although there is typically greater benefit from adding time points at the expense of replicates, the costs of sampling adequately to identify medically-relevant changes in temporal dynamics may be prohibitive, especially when the dynamic 13 processes are not already well understood.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dose response, measured as the expression trend across doses, was the primary outcome. Such design provides greater statistical power in gene expression profiling than fewer dose levels with more replicates per dose level (34). For example, ten dose levels with one mouse each would provide 80% power to detect a correlation between dose and gene expression of r > 0.95 (Spearman) with an uncorrected p value of ~0.0002.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of collection will necessarily depend on the duration of the response and practical and financial considerations. Increasing density will necessarily increase the correlative power of the study without negatively affecting the observation of transiently expressed genes (Supplementary Figure S7B & (75)). However, replication ensures uniformity of the biology underlying the process in question (figure 1B), thus enabling confident dissection of transient or periodic gene expression patterns from noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%