2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tradeoffs between soil, water, and carbon – A national scale analysis from New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…concentration of leachate was estimated by dividing the annual nitrate-N leached by the volume of water yield, on a catchment-bycatchment basis (Dymond et al 2011). With a few exceptions, the median river water concentration was less than the mean leachate concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…concentration of leachate was estimated by dividing the annual nitrate-N leached by the volume of water yield, on a catchment-bycatchment basis (Dymond et al 2011). With a few exceptions, the median river water concentration was less than the mean leachate concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A catchment estimate of DRP in leachate was estimated by combining a national map of water yield (Dymond et al 2011) with the map of concentration of DRP in subsurface flow. Similar to Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Human management of ecosystems may cause a mutual conversion between tradeoffs and synergies that arise as the spatial scales move up, bringing about desirable or undesirable outcomes (Heal, 2000;Balvanera et al, 2001). Addressing these challenges requires accounting for mainstream ESs spatio-temporally at different scales during LULC changes (McNally et al, 2011;Dymond et al, 2012). Along with the growing recognition of integrating ESs into ecosystem-based management decisions, spatial patterns of ESs across landscapes should be more broadly explored (Egoh et al, 2008;Tallis et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decreased water yield of forests was estimated using the WATYIELD model (Fahey et al 2010;Dymond et al 2011 A national map of the ratio of biodiversity benefit over cost of lost production was derived and areas with ratios higher than 0.2 were identified. We thought 0.2 represented a threshold above which the biodiversity value represented a significant proportion of the cost of lost production.…”
Section: Other Ecosystem Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%