Traditional ecological knowledge in restoration ecology: a call to listen deeply, to engage with, and respect Indigenous voices

Abstract

The United Nations heralded 2021-2030 as the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. A socioecological approach to restoration has been proposed that honors the diversity in ecological landscapes and their respective cultures and peoples with the goal of repairing degraded ecosystems. Indigenous peoples are intimately interconnected with landscapes, which are under mounting pressure from anthropogenic global environmental change. Article 31 of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples states the rights of Indigenous peoples to maintain, protect, and control their culture and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK); however, these rights have not always been acknowledged. We are concerned that large global restoration goals will continue to promote TEK extraction that further perpetuates inequities and discrimination of Indigenous peoples. If the restoration sector wishes to partner with Indigenous communities leading TEK efforts, it needs to understand established international agreements and proactively protect intellectual property and data sovereignty rights. To illustrate a theme of ethical engagement, we present risks to TEK integrity while highlighting engagement that has successfully promoted Indigenous leadership and self-determination. We propose that a decade of responsible and respectful restoration will be achieved only with shared principles and an ethical code of conduct for TEK partnerships. We argue that deep listening with Indigenous peoples and engagement with humility and respect needs to be the starting point. Finally, we propose an Indigenous-led workshop to reimagine and re-develop equitable ways forward for TEK partnerships in restoration, with explicit considerations for the rights, livelihoods, and leadership of Indigenous peoples.

Twenty Important Research Questions in Microbial Exposure and Social Equity

“…Recent UN reports on infectious disease indicate that most governments worldwide are concerned about social equity and exposure to emerging diseases ( 171 ). We echo their call for collaborative land protection and rehabilitation that is sensitive to local context ( 172 ) and Indigenous knowledge ( 173 , 174 ). For instance, Indigenous Peoples’ land sovereignty can provide an opportunity to decolonize land practices ( 175 ) and strengthen the resilience of communities especially when resource distribution is disrupted by events like a pandemic ( 171 ).…”

Ten people‐centered rules for socially sustainable ecosystem restoration

“…“Engaging stakeholders” is the first principle of forest landscape restoration (Besseau et al 2018) and of the SER's “International Principles and Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration” (Gann et al 2019), and the second “golden rule” from di Sacco et al (2021). Yet, in practice, stakeholder identification is complex, and their engagement can be fraught with power inequalities (Robinson et al 2021). Stakeholders in restoration operate at multiple levels: from multinational corporations financing carbon offsets to local communities relying on natural resources for food and livelihoods (Mansourian 2021).…”

Patient-Planetary Health Co-benefit Prescribing: Emerging Considerations for Health Policy and Health Professional Practice

“…Indigenous traditional knowledge is deep, evidenced-informed, resilient, and time tested, yet it does not come without Indigenous Peoples themselves. Established international agreements that serve to protect Indigenous Peoples and their knowledges, and the proactive protection of intellectual property and data sovereignty rights must be front and center to avoid the further perpetuation of inequities and discrimination of Indigenous Peoples (57). Moving forward "in a good way" (58) will require the elevation and amplification of Indigenous voices within healthcare spaces, including within planetary health and sustainability spaces (41).…”