1995
DOI: 10.1080/08832323.1995.10117764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traditional versus Contemporary Goals and Methods in Accounting Education: Bridging the Gap with Cooperative Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account that accounting is a practice with profoundly social derivations and implications (Burchell, Clubb, Hopwood, Hughes, & Nahapiet, 1980), it is very important to study the implications of teaching accounting, and to analyze different ways to do it, such as the application of cooperative learning in accounting courses. There are some experiences in cooperative learning in accounting courses, like Lindquist (1995) who conducted a case study in which students formed groups and studied various auditing reporting issues and at the main conclusions were that students prefer cooperative learning way and perceive greater achievement. There are other studies about the differences between CL and TL in accounting based on academic performance with antagonist conclusions; with no differences between both teaching methods Lancaster and Strand (2001), Ravenscroft and Buckless (1997) or Marcheggiani, Davis and Sander (1999).…”
Section: Comparison Of Cooperative and Traditional Learning Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account that accounting is a practice with profoundly social derivations and implications (Burchell, Clubb, Hopwood, Hughes, & Nahapiet, 1980), it is very important to study the implications of teaching accounting, and to analyze different ways to do it, such as the application of cooperative learning in accounting courses. There are some experiences in cooperative learning in accounting courses, like Lindquist (1995) who conducted a case study in which students formed groups and studied various auditing reporting issues and at the main conclusions were that students prefer cooperative learning way and perceive greater achievement. There are other studies about the differences between CL and TL in accounting based on academic performance with antagonist conclusions; with no differences between both teaching methods Lancaster and Strand (2001), Ravenscroft and Buckless (1997) or Marcheggiani, Davis and Sander (1999).…”
Section: Comparison Of Cooperative and Traditional Learning Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Lindquist (1995) undertook a study in which students formed groups and studied various auditing reporting problems. By the end of the study, students reported a strong preference for seminar-based teaching and perceived greater achievement as a result.…”
Section: The Seminar-based Teaching Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under this more conceptual approach, the questions and the resulting answers deliver the content of the course (Wiggins, 1987), rather than the instructor simply lecturing to students. Also, consideration was given to the notion, supported in the literature, that cooperative learning results in greater mastery of a subject than individual learning does (Slavin, 1987;Lindquist, 1995). Most accounting professors are unaware of the benefits of cooperative learning (Cottell & Millis, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This method will be referred to as the group-Socratic style (a more complete explanation of the group-Socratic approach, along with examples of questions used, is presented in the appendix). Lindquist (1995) conducted a case study of the effects of cooperative learning techniques on auditing students' attitudes and achievement. His results suggested that student learning improved through the use of such techniques.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%